Bush's crisis management style was portrayed
as an autocratic one-man show, with Bush refusing to convoke the usual "excomm"-style
crisis committee with representatives from State, Defense, NSA, CIA, and
other interested bureaucratic parties. Instead, Bush reportedly insisted
on being furnished with three parallel streams of reports from State,
Defense, and CIA. While he was puzzling over the conflicting evaluations,
his coup team was being rounded up and liquidated. It was worse than his
blundering management of the Sudan coup in 1985.
There are signs that the wide criticism
of his botched handling of the coup, including from such close allies as
Skull and Bones Senator David Boren of Oklahoma, was an excruciating
personal humiliation for Bush. As the feared former boss of Langley, he
was supposedly a past master in subversion, putsches, and the toppling of
governments disobedient to Washington. His foreign policy credentials,
touted as the strong suit in his resume, were now fatally tarnished.
According to some alleged insider accounts, US forces had not rushed to
the aid of the rebels because of reluctance and mistrust on the part of US
officers, starting with Gen. Thurman, the US commander in Panama.
Congressman Dave McCurdy of Oklahoma
criticized Bush: "Yesterday makes Jimmy Carter look like a man of resolve.
There's a resurgence of the wimp factor." George Will wrote a column
entitled "An Unserious Presidency."
Bush hid from the press for 11 days after
the golpe was crushed, but then had to face a barrage of hostile questions
anyway. Since he had urged the overthrow of Noriega, he was asked, was it
consistent not to back the rebels with US armed forces? Bush replied:
Yes, absolutely consistent. I want to see
him [Noriega] out of there and I want to see him brought to justice. And
that should not imply that that automatically means, no matter what the
plan is, or no matter what the coup attempt is, diplomatically and
anything else, that we give carte blanche support to that.
I think this rather sophisticated
argument that if you say you'd like to see Noriega out, that implies a
blanket, open carte blanche on the use of American military force...to me
that's a stupid argument that some very erudite people make.
Bush was very sarcastic about "instant
hawks appearing from where there used to be feathers of a dove." There had
been reports of severe temper tantrums by Bush as critical accounts of his
crisis leadership had been leaked from inside his own administration. But
Bush denied that he had been chewing the carpet: "I never felt, you know,
anger or blowing up. It's absurd," Bush stated disingenuously. "I didn't
get angry. I didn't get angry. What I did say is, I don't want to see any
blame coming out of the Oval Office or attributed to the Oval Office in
the face of criticism. I'm not in the blame business. Blame, if there's
some to be assigned, it comes in there. And that's where it belongs." Bush
stressed that he was ready to use force to oust Noriega: "I wouldn't mind
using force now if it could be done in a prudent manner. We want to see
Mr. Noriega out." The mortified former CIA director also defended the
quality of his intelligence: "There has not been an intelligence gap that
would make me act in a different way." "I don't see any serious
disconnects at all." [fn 22] Bush's chief of staff, Sununu, had stated
that one of the difficulties faced by the White House in reacting to the
coup had been the difficulty of determining the identity of the coup
leaders. While that was probably disinformation, Bush's disarray was most
poignant. It was while squirming and whining under of the opprobrium of
his first failure in Panama that Bush matured the idea of a large-scale
military invasion to capture Noriega and occupy Panama around Christmas,
1989.
George Bush's involvement with Panama
goes back to operations conducted in Central American and the Caribbean
conducted by Senator Prescott Bush's Jupiter Island Harrimanite cabal. We
recall Bush's pugnacious assertions of US sovereignty over the Panama
Canal during his 1964 electoral contest with Senator Yarborough. For the
Bush clan, the cathexis of Panama is very deep, since it is bound up with
the exploits of Theodore Roosevelt, the founder of the twentieth-century
US imperialism which the Bush family is determined to defend to the
farthest corners of the planet. For it was Theodore Roosevelt who had used
the USS Nashville and other US naval forces to prevent the Colombian
military from repressing the US-fomented revolt of Panamanian soldiers in
November, 1903, thus setting the stage for the creation of an independent
Panama and for the signing of the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty which created a
Panama Canal Zone under US control. Roosevelt's "cowboy diplomacy" had
been excoriated in the US press of those days as "piracy;" the Springfield
Republican had found the episode "the most discreditable in our history,"
but the Bush view was always pro-imperialist. It was the comparison with
Theodore Roosevelt's bucaneering audacity that made poor George look bad.
Theodore Roosevelt had in December, 1904
expounded his so-called "Roosevelt Corrollary" to the Monroe Doctrine, in
reality a complete repudiation and perversion of the anti-colonial essence
of John Quincy Adams's original warning to the British and other
imperialists. The self-righteous Teddy Roosevelt had stated that:
Chronic wrongdoing...may in America, as
elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and
in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe
Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant
cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international
police power. [fn 23]
The old imperialist idea of Theodore Roosevelt was quickly revived by the
Bush Administration during 1989. Through a series of actions by Attorney
General Richard Thornburgh, the US Supreme Court, and CIA Director William
Webster, the Bush regime arrogated to itself a sweeping carte blanche for
extraterritorial interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states,
all in open defiance of the norms of international law. These illegal
innovations can be summarized under the heading of the "Thornburgh
Doctrine." The Federal Bureau of Investigation arrogated to itself the
"right" to search premises outside of US territory and to arrest and
kidnap foreign citizens outside of US jurisdiction, all without the
concurrence of the judicial process of the other countries whose territory
was thus subject to violation. US armed forces were endowed with the
"right" to take police measures against civilians. The CIA demanded that
an Executive Order prohibiting the participation of US government
officials and military personnel in the assassination of foreign political
leaders, which had been issued by President Ford in October, 1976, be
rescinded. There is every indication that this presidential ban on
assassinations of foreign officials and politicians, which had been
promulgated in response to the Church and Pike Committee investigations of
CIA abuses, has indeed been abrogated. To round out this lawless package,
an opinion of the US Supreme Court issued on February 28, 1990 permitted
US officials abroad to arrest (or kidnap) and search foreign citizens
without regard to the laws or policy of the foreign nation subject to this
interference. Through these actions, the Bush regime effectively staked
its claim to universal extraterritorial jurisdiction, the classic posture
of an empire seeking to assert universal police power. The Bush regime
aspired to the status of a world power legibus solutus, a superpower
exempted from all legal restrictions. [fn 24]
Back in January, 1972, at the
extraordinary session of the United Nations Security Council in Addis
Ababa, the Panamanian delegate, Aquilino Boyd, had delivered a scathing
condemnation of the American "occupation" of the Canal Zone, which most
Panamanians found increasingly intolerable. At that time Ambassador Bush
had wormed his way out of a tough situation by pleading that Boyd was out
of order, since Panama had not been placed on the agenda for the meeting.
Boyd was relentless in pressing for a special session of the Security
Council in Panama City at which he could bring up the issue of sovereignty
over the Canal Zone and the canal. Later, in March, 1973, Bush's successor
at the UN post, John Scali, was forced to resort to a veto in order to
kill a resolution calling for the "full respect for Panama's effective
sovereignty over all its territory." This veto had been a big political
embarrassment, since it was cast in the face of vociferous condemnation
from the visitors' gallery, which was full of Panamanian patriots. To make
matters worse, the US had been totally isolated, with 13 countries
supporting the resolution and one abstention. [fn 25]
As we have seen, direct personal dealings
between Bush and Noriega went back at least as far as Bush's 1976 CIA
tenure. At that time Noriega, who had been trained by the US at Fort
Gulick, Fort Bragg, and other locations, was the chief of intelligence for
the Panamanian nationalist leader, Gen. Omar Torrijos, with whom Carter
signed the Panama Canal Treaty, the ratification of which by the US Senate
meant that the canal would revert to Panama by the year 2000. During the
treaty negotiations between Torrijos and the Carter Administration, the US
National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency are alleged
to have conducted electronic eavesdropping against Panamanian officials
involved in the negotiations. This bugging had reportedly been discovered
by Noriega, who had allegedly proceeded to bribe members of the US Army's
470th Military Intelligence Group, who furnished him with tapes of all the
bugged conversations, which Noriega then submitted to Torrijos. According
to published accounts, the US Army had investigated this situation under a
probe code-named Operation Canton Song, and identified a group of "singing
sergeants" on Noriega's payroll. Lew Allen, Jr., the head of the NSA,
supposedly wanted a public indictment of the sergeants for treason and
espionage, but Bush is alleged to have demurred, saying that the matter
had to be left to the Army, which had decided to cover up the matter. A
plausible political cover story for Bush's refusal to prosecute was his
desire to avoid scandals in the intelligence community that could hurt
Gerald Ford in the 1976 election. [fn 26] Whatever the truth of all these
allegations, there seems to be no doubt that Bush met personally with
Noriega during his 1976 CIA tenure. According to one account, that
Bush-Noriega meeting was a luncheon held in December, 1976 at the
residence of the Panamanian Ambassador to Washington. As Ferderick Kempe
notes, "Years later in 1988, after Noriega was indicted on drug charges in
Florida, Bush would at first deny having ever met Noriega. He thereafter
recalled the meeting, but none of its details. His three lunch guests have
better memories and one of them insisted this was the third meeting
between the two men." [fn 27]
During the preparation of his 1991 trial
in Miami, Florida, Noriega's defense attorneys submitted a document to the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in which
they specified matters they intended to use in Noriega's defense which
might involve information considered classified by the US government.
Before being released to the public, this document was heavily censored.
No part of this filing is more heavily censored, however, than the section
entitled "General Noriega's Relationship with George Bush," which has been
whited out on approximately 6 of 15 pages, allegedly to protect US
national security, but in reality to hide material that is explosively
compromising to the political reputation of Bush. Noriega's proffer
confirms a Bush-Noriega meeting on December 8, 1976 at the Panamanian
Embassy in Washington. "During this meeting there were discussions
concerning the unrest in the canal zone. But at no time did Mr. Bush
suggest that the Panamanian government was in any way responsible for the
bombing" that had occurred in the Canal Zone when Ford, worried about
attacks from Reagan demanding that the canal remain in US hands, had cut
off the talks on the future of the canal. Noriega's proffer adds that
"when Bush left office he sent a letter to Noriega thanking Noriega for
his assistance. Bush said that he was going to inform his successor of
Noriega's cooperation." [fn 28]
During this period, the CIA was allegedly
paying Noriega a retainer of $110,000 per year, supposedly in exchange for
Noriega's intelligence on Cuban and other activities of interest to the
US. Admiral Stansfield Turner claims that when he took over the CIA, he
terminated the payments to Noriega, and refused to meet with him. Turner
confirms several details of the Bush-Noriega relationship of those years:
"We all know that Bush met with Noriega, even though he was there only 11
months. And I will affirm that Bush had him on the payroll," said Turner
in October, 1988. "I was there four years, and I never saw fit to see him
[Noriega] or have him on the payroll," said Turner. [fn 29] Turner went on
to say that after the fall of Carter Bush re-instated Noriega as a US
asset, asserting that Bush "met with Noriega and put him back on the
payroll" as a purveyor of intelligence. Turner would not specify his
proof, but was nevertheless categorical: "I can tell you I am very
confident of that."
During 1991, reports surfaced of a joint
project of the CIA and the Mossad in central America which included
large-scale smuggling of illegal drugs from Colombia through Panama to the
United States. This was code-named "Operation Watchtower." According to an
affidavit signed by the late Colonel Edward P. Cutolo, a US Army Special
Forces Commander who was in charge of operations in Colombia subsumed
under this project, "the purpose of Operation Watch Tower was to establish
a series of three electronic beacon towers beginning outside of Bogota,
Colombia and running northeast to the border of Panama. Once the Watch
Tower teams were in place, the beacon was activated to emit a signal that
aircraft could fix on and fly undetected from Bogota to Panama, then land
at Albrook Air Station." [fn 30] According to Cutolo, the flights were
often met at Albrook Air Station by Noriega, other PDF officers, CIA
agents, and an Israeli national believed to be David Kimche of the Mossad.
Another Israeli involved in the flights was Mossad agent Michael Harari,
who maintained a close relation to Noriega until the time of the US
invasion of December 20, 1989. According to Cutolo's affidavit, "I was
told from Pentagon contacts, off the record, that CIA Director Stansfield
Turner and former CIA Director George Bush are among the VIPs that shield
Harari from public scrutiny." According to Cutolo, "the cargo flown from
Colombia to Panama was cocaine," which ultimately ended up in the United
States. The profits were allegedly laundered through a series of banks,
including banks in Panama. According to published reports, Cutolo and a
long list of other US military personnel who knew about Operation
Watchtower died under suspicious circumstances during the 1980's, one of
them after having vainly attempted to interest the CBS News "60 Minutes "
staff in this matter. Mike Harari of the Mossad is reportedly a prime
suspect in the death of one of these US officers, Army Col. James Rowe,
who was killed in the Philippines on April 21, 1989. Was Operation
Watchtower on the agenda of the Bush-Noriega meeting of 1976?
According to Noriega's CIPA proffer,
"another contact between Noriega and George Bush was after George Bush
became Vice-President. At this time Noriega sent Bush a letter of
congratulations and Bush sent back a response. In this letter, dated
December 23, 1980, Bush says 'thanks for the great congratulatory
message.' He also says, 'I do recall your visit in 1976 and I hope our
paths will cross again.'" [fn 31]
There can be no doubt that Noriega's
dealings with the Reagan-Bush administration were very intense. According
to Panamanian turncoat Jose Blandon, Noriega frequently traveled to
Washington for secret private meetings with CIA Director William Casey
during 1982-83 and the year following. Noriega also met somewhat later
with Bush's Iran-contra point man, Oliver North. [fn 32] According to
Noriega's CIPA submission, Noriega was introduced to North on a cruise
down the Potomac by US General Schweitzer, the director of the
Inter-American joint military group. According to Noriega's CIPA
submission, North had been drinking heavily and talked in an animated
fashion about the problems encountered by the contras. "North was
particularly concerned with allegations that had surfaced connecting the
contras with narcotics trafficking." One US public figure who had called
attention to the contras as drug pushers was Lyndon LaRouche. "North urged
Noriega to do whatever he could for the contras. During this meeting North
claimed that he was in charge of all operations in central America having
to do with the contras and that he was working directly for Reagan and
Bush. Although North asked for help he did not say exactly what he wanted.
North did tell Noriega that if at any time he needed to talk to North that
Noriega could just call him at the White House." [fn 33]
According to Noriega's CIPA proffer
submitted in preparation for his trial in Miami, "from around August of
1985 through September of 86 Noriega repeatedly received emissaries from
Oliver North. One was Humberto Quinones. Quinones attempted to ingratiate
himself with Noriega and repeatedly used Reagan's and Bush's names.
Quinones said that the contras are not fighting very well and requested
that Panama come to the aid of the contras."
Later, at the end of the summer of 1985,
Noriega met with North and Secord in London. North demanded that Noriega
use Panamanian commandos to conduct operations against the Sandinista
regime. "Noriega just listened" and did not agree to cooperate. [fn 34]
This was all denied by the Bush campaign
through spokesman Steve Hart, but a photo exists of Bush meeting with
Noriega in Panama City in December, 1983. Don Gregg was also on the scene.
This meeting was also attended by Everett Briggs, then the US Ambassador
to Panama. During the previous months, Noriega had repudiated the policy
of supporting the Nicaraguan contra rebels which the Bushmen had
successfully sold to Reagan as his leading obsession. Noriega had done
this by declaring his support of the Contadora group, which thus emerged
as an alignment of Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, and Panama, and which
advocated a plan for pacification and the restoration of national
sovereignty in Central America as a whole through the interdiction of
gun-running, plus the removal of foreign advisers and bases. According to
Briggs, Bush may have sought Noriega's diplomatic support for the US
position in the region. But Briggs denies that Bush was also looking for
Panamanian military support against the Sandinistas. According to the
Bushmen, Bush's pourparler in Panama was devoted to a "privileged" talk
with the President of Panama, Ricardo de la Espriella, who was also
present at the meeting. [fn 35] But Noriega was clearly the dominant
figure on the Panamanian political scene.
Later, Bush henchman Don Gregg was
obliged to testify under oath about Bush's relations with Noriega in the
context of the civil lawsuit brought by the Christic Institute of
Washington, DC against members of the Bush-Shackley-Clines Enterprise.
Gregg specified that Ambassador Briggs was himself a friend of Bush. Gregg
said that at the December, 1983 meeting, Panamanian President Ricardo de
la Espriella had denied US press reports alleging Panamanian government
complicity in drug trafficking.
But while Noriega kept close relations
with the United States, he also dealt with Cuba and other countries in the
region. Noriega was increasingly motivated by Panamanian nationalism, and
a desire to preserve a margin of independence for his country. The
hostility of the US government against Noriega was occasioned first of all
by Noriega's refusal to be subservient to the US policy of waging war
against the Sandinista regime. This was explained by Noriega in an
interview with CBS journalist Mike Wallace on February 4, 1988, in which
Noriega described the US campaign against him as a "political conspiracy
of the Department of Justice." Noriega described a visit to Panama on
December 17, 1985 by Admiral John Poindexter, then the chief of the US
National Security Council, who demanded that Noriega join in acts of war
against Nicaragua, and then threatened Panama with economic warfare and
political destabilization when Noriega refused to go along with
Poindexter's plans:
Noriega: Poindexter said he came in the
name of President Reagan. He said that Panama and Mexico were acting
against US policy in Central America because we were saying that the
Nicaragua conflict must be settled peacefully. And that wasn't good enough
for the plans of the Reagan administration. The single thing that will
protect us from being economically and politically attacked by the United
States is that we allow the contras to be trained in Panama for the fight
against Nicaragua.
Wallace: He told you that you would be economically attacked if you didn't
do that?
Noriega: It was stated, Panama must
expect economic consequences. Your interest was that we should aid the
contras, and we said 'no' to that.
Poindexter outlined plans for a US
invasion of Nicaragua that would require the fig-leaf of participation of
troops from other countries in the region:
Noriega: Yes, they wanted to attack
Nicaragua and the only reason it hadn't already happened was that Panama
was in the way, and all they wanted was that Panama would open the way and
make it possible for them to continue their plans.
According to Noriega's advisor,
Panamanian Defense Forces Captain Cortiso, "[the US] wanted that
Panamanian forces attack first. Then we would receive support from US
troops." [fn 36]
It was in this same December, 1985 period
that Bush and Don Gregg met with Ambassador Briggs to discuss the
Noriega's refusal to follow dictation from Washington. According to Gregg
in his deposition in the Christic Institute lawsuit, "I think we [i.e.,
Bush and Gregg] came away from the meeting with Ambassador Brggs with the
sense that Noriega was a growing problem, politically, militarily, and
possibly in the drug area." When pressed to comment about Noriega's
alleged relations to drug trafficking, Gregg could only add: "It would
have been part of the general picture of Noriega as a political problem,
corruption, and a general policy problem. Yes." [fn 37] "I don't recall
any specific discussion of Noriega's involvement in drugs," Gregg
testified. In this case it is quite possible that Don Gregg is for once
providing accurate testimony: the US government decision to begin
interference in Panama's internal affairs for the overthrow of Noriega had
nothing to do with questions of drug trafficking. It was predicated on
Noriega's rejection of Poindexter's ultimatum demanding support for the
Nicargauan contras, themselves a notorious gang of drug pushers enjoying
the full support of Bush and the US government. Colonel Samuel J. Watson
III, deputy national security adviser to Bush during those years, invoked
executive privilege during the course of his Christic Institute deposition
on the advice of his lawyer in order to avoid answering questions about
Bush's 1985 meeting with Briggs. [fn 38]
In addition to the question of contra
aid, another rationale for official US rage against Noriega had emerged
during 1985. President Nicky Barletta, a darling of the State Department
and a former vice president of the genocidal World Bank, attempted to
impose a package of conditionalities and economic adjustment measures
dictated by the International Monetary Fund. This was a package of brutal
austerity, and riots soon erupted in protest against Barletta. Noriega
refused to comply with Barletta's request to use the Panamanian military
forces to put down these anti-austerity riots, and the IMF austerity
package was thus compromised. Barletta was shortly forced out as
president.
During 1986-1987, Noriega cooperated with
US law enforcement officials in a number of highly effective anti-drug
operations. This successful joint effort was documented by letters of
commendation sent to Noriega by John C. Lawn, at that time head of the US
Drug Enforcement Administration. On February 13, 1987, Lawn wrote to
Noriega: "Your longstanding support of the Drug Enforcement Administration
is greatly appreciated. International police cooperation and vigorous
pursuit of drug traffickers are our common goal." Later in the same year,
Lawn wrote to Noriega to commend the latter's contributions to Operation
Pisces, a joint US-Panamanian effort against drug smuggling and drug money
laundering. Panamanian participation was facilitated by a tough new law,
called Law 23, which contained tough new provisions against drug money
laundering. Lawn 's letter to Noriega of May 27, 1987 includes the
following: *As you know, the recently concluded Operation Pisces was
enormously successful: many millions of dollars and many thousands of
pounds of drugs have been taken from the drug traffickers and
international money launderers....
Again, the DEA and officials of Panama
have together dealt an effective blow against drug dealers and
international money launderers. Your personal commitment to Operation
Pisces and the competent, professional, and tireless efforts of other
officials in the Republic of Panama were essential to the final positive
outcome of this investigation. Drugs dealers throughout the world now know
that the profits of their illegal operations are not welcome in Panama.
The operation of May 6 led to the freezing of millions of dollars in the
bank accounts of drug dealers. Simultaneously, bank papers were
confiscated that gave officials important insights into the drug trade and
the laundering operations of the drug trade. The DEA has always valued
close cooperation, and we are prepared to proceed together against
international drug dealers whenever the opportunity presents itself. [fn
39]
By a striking coincidence, it was in
June, 1987, just one month after this glowing tribute had been written,
that the US government declared war against Panama, initiating a campaign
to destabilize Noriega on the pretexts of lack of democracy and
corruption. On June 30, 1987, the US State Department demanded the ouster
of General Noriega. Elliott Abrams, the Assistant Secretary of State for
Latin American Affairs, later indicted for perjury in 1991 for his role in
the Iran-contra scandal and coverup, made the announcement. Abrams took
note of a resolution passed on June 23 by the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee demanding the creation of a "democratic government" in Panama,
and officially concurred, thus making the toppling of Noriega the official
US policy. Abrams also demanded that the Panamanian military be freed of
"political corruption."
These were precisely the destabilization
measures which Poindexter had threatened 18 months earlier. The actual
timing of the US demand for the ouster of Noriega appears to have been
dictated by resentment in the US financial community over Noriega's
apparent violation of certain taboos in his measures against drug money
laundering. As the New York Times commented in on August 10, 1987: "The
political crisis follows closely what bankers here saw as a serious breach
of bank secrecy regulations. Earlier this year, as part of an American
campaign against the laundering of drug money, the Panamanian government
froze a few suspect accounts here in a manner that bankers and lawyers
regarded as arbitrary." These were precisely the actions lauded by Lawn.
Had Noriega shut down operations sanctioned by the US intelligence
community, or confiscated assets of the New York banks?
In November, 1987, Noriega was visited by
Bush's former vice presidential chief of staff, Admiral Daniel J. Murphy.
Murphy had left Bush's office in 1985 to go into the international
consulting business. Murphy was accompanied on his trip by Tongsun Park, a
protagonist of the 1976 Koreagate scandal which had served Bush so well.
Murphy claimed that Park was part of a group of international businessmen
who had sent him to Panama to determine if Murphy could help in "restoring
stability in Panama" as a representative of the businessmen or of the
Panamanian government, a singular cover story. "I was really there trying
to find out whether there was negotiating room between him and the
opposition," Murphy said in early 1988. There were reports that Murphy,
who had conferred with NSC chief Colin Powell, Don Gregg and Elliott
Abrams of the State Department before he went to Panama, had told Noriega
that he could stay in office through early 1989 if he allowed political
reforms, free elections, and a free press, but Murphy denied having done
this. It is still not known with precision what mission Murphy was sent to
Panama to perform for Bush. [fn 40]
On August 12, 1987, Noriega responded to
the opposition campaigns fomented by the US inside Panama by declaring
that the aim of Washington and its Panamanian minions was "to smash Panama
as a free and independent nation. It is a repetition of what Teddy
Roosevelt did when he militarily attacked following the separation of
Panama from Colombia." On August 13, 1987, the Los Angeles Times reported
that US Assistant Attorney General Stephen Trott, who had headed up the
Department of Justice "Get Noriega" Task Force for more than a year, had
sent out orders to "pull together everything that we have on him [Noriega]
in order to see if he is prosecutable." This classic "enemies' list"
operation was clearly aimed at fabricating drug charges against Noriega,
since that was the political spin which the US regime wished to impart to
its attack on Panama. In February, 1988, Noriega was indicted on US drugs
charges, despite a lack of evidence and an even more compelling lack of
jurisdiction. This indictment was quickly followed by economic sanctions,
an embargo on trade, and other economic warfare measures that were invoked
by Washington on March 2, 1988. All of these measures were timed to
coincide with the "Super Tuesday" presidential preference primaries in the
southern states, where Bush was able to benefit from the racist appeal of
the assault on Noriega, who is of mestizo background and has a swarthy
complexion.
During the spring of 1988, the Reagan
Administration conducted a negotiation with Noriega with the declared aim
of convincing him to relinquish power in exchange for having the drug
charges against him dropped. In May, Michael G. Kozak, the deputy
assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American affairs had been sent to
Panama to meet with Noriega. Bush had come under attack from other
presidential candidates, especially Dukakis, for being soft on Noriega and
seeking a plea bargain with the Panamanian leader. Bush first took the
floor during the course of an administration policymaking meeting to
advocate an end of the bargaining with Noriega. According to press
reports, this proposal was "hotly contested." Then, in a speech in Los
Angeles, Bush made one of his exceedingly rare departures from the Reagan
line by announcing with a straight face that a Bush Administration would
not "bargain with drug dealers" at home or abroad. [fn 41]
Bush's interest in Noriega continued
after he had assumed the presidency. On April 6, 1989, Bush formally
declared that the government of Panama represented an "unusual and
extraordinary threat" to US national security and foreign policy. He
invoked the National Emergencies Act and the International Emergency Act
to declare a state of "national emergency" in this country to meet the
menace allegedly posed by the nationalists of little Panama. The May 1,
1989 issue of US News and World Report revealed that Bush had authorized
the expenditure of $10 million in CIA funds for operations against the
Panamanian government. These funds were obviously to be employed to
influence the Panamanian elections, which were scheduled for early May.
The money was delivered to Panama by CIA bagman Carlos Eleta Almaran, who
had just been arrested in Georgia in April, 1989 on charges of drug
trafficking. On May 2, with one eye on those elections, Bush attempted to
refurbish his wimp image with a blustering tirade delivered to the
Rockefeller-controlled Council of the Americas in which he stated: "Let me
say one thing clearly. The USA will not accept the results of fraudulent
elections that serve to keep the supreme commander of the Panamanian armed
forces in power." This made clear that Bush intended to declare the
elections undemocratic if the pro-Noriega candidates were not defeated.
In the elections of May 7, the CIA's $10
million and other monies were used to finance an extensive covert
operation which aimed at stealing the elections. The US-supported Civic
Democratic Alliance, whose candidate was Guillermo Endara, purchased
votes, bribed the election officials, and finally physically absconded
with the official vote tallies. Because of the massive pattern of fraud
and irregularities, the Panamanian government annulled the election.
Somewhere along the line the usual US-staged "people power" upsurge had
failed to materialize. The inability of Bush to force through a victory by
the anti-Noriega opposition was a first moment of humiliation for the
would-be Rough Rider.
This was the occasion for a new outburst
of hypocritical breast-beating from Bush, whose vote fraud operation had
not worked so well in Panama as it had in New Hampshire. Speaking at the
commencement ceremonies of Mississippi State University in Starkville,
Mississippi, Bush issued a formal call to the citizens and soldiers of
Panama to overthrow Noriega, asserting that "they ought to do everything
they can to get Mr. Noriega out of there." Asked whether this was a call
for a military coup against Noriega, Bush replied: "I would love to see
them get him out of there. Not just the PDF-- the will of the people of
Panama." Bush elaborated that his was a call for "a revolution--the people
rose up and spoke for-- in a democratic election with a substantial - a
tremendous- turnout, said what they wanted. The will of the people should
not be thwarted by this man and a handful of these Doberman thugs." "I
think the election made so clear that the people want democracy and made
so clear that democracy is being thwarted by one man that that in itself
would be the catalyst for removing Noriega," Bush added, making his
characteristic equation of "democracy" with a regime subservient to US
whim. Bush prevaricated on his own commitment to disbanding the Panamanian
Defense Forces, saying that he wanted to "make clear... that there's no
vendetta against the Panamanian Defense Forces as an institution;" the US
was concerned only with Noriega's "thuggery" and "pariah" status. Bush
seemed also to invite the assassination of Noriega by blurting out, "No, I
would add no words of caution" on how to do any of this. He slyly kept an
escape hatch open in case a coup leader called on the US for support, as
in fact later happened: "If the PDF asks for support to get rid of
Noriega, they wouldn't need support from the United States in order to get
rid of Noriega. He's one man, and they have a well-trained force." Bush
also seemed to encourage Noriega to flee to a country from which he could
not be extradited back to the US, which sounded like a recipe for avoiding
legal proceedings that could prove highly embarrassing to Bush personally
and to the whole US government.
During this period, Admiral William
Crowe, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, attempted to convince
the US commander in Panama, Gen. Frederick F. Woerner, to accept a
brigade-sized reinforcement of 3,000 troops in addition to the 12,000 men
already stationed in Panama. Woerner declined the additional men, which
the Pentagon had intended to dispatch with great fanfare in an attempt to
intimidate Noriega and his triumphant supporters. At this point the
Pentagon activated preparations for Operation Blue Spoon, which included a
contingency plan to kidnap Noriega with the help of a Delta force unit.
There were discussions about whether an attempt could be made to abduct
Noriega with any likelihood of success; it was concluded that Noriega was
very wily and exceedingly difficult to track. It was in the course of
these deliberations that Defense Secretary Cheney is reported to have told
Crowe, "'You know, the President has got a long history of vindictive
political actions.'' Cross Bush and you pay,' he said, supplying the names
of a few victims and adding: Bush remembers and you have to be careful."
[fn 42] Thus intimidated by Bush, the military commanders concurred in
Bush's announcement of a brigade-sized reinforcement for Woerner, plus the
secret dispatch of Delta forces and Navy Seals. On July 17, Bush approved
a plan to "assert US treaty rights" by undertaking demonstrative military
provocations in violation of the treaty. Woerner was soon replaced by
General Maxwell Reid "Mad Max" Thurman, who would bring no qualms to his
assignment of aggression. Thurman took over at the Southern Command on
September 30.
In the wake of this tirade, the US forces
in Panama began a systematic campaign of military provocations which
continued all the way to the December 20 invasion. In July the US forces
began practicing how to seize control of important Panamanian military
installations and civilian objectives, all in flagrant violation of the
Panama Canal Treaty. On July 1, for example, the town of Gamboa was seized
and held for 24 hours by US troops, tanks, and helicopters. The mayor of
the town and 30 other persons were illegally detained during this
"maneuver." In Chilibre, the US forces occupied the key water purification
plant serving Panama City and Colon. On August 15, Bush escalated the
rhetoric still further by proclaiming that he had the obligation "to
kidnap Noriega". Then, during the first days of October, there came the
abortive US-sponsored coup attempt, followed by the public humiliation of
George Bush, who had failed to measure up to the standards of efficacy set
by Theodore Roosevelt.
All during October and November and into
December, the Bush Administration worked to prepare the plans for a
large-scale invasion of Panama, Operation Blue Spoon. By mid-December,
there were a total of 24,000 US troops in Panama, arrayed against the
16,000 of the PDF, of whom only about 3,500 were organized and equipped
for military combat.
The US was now committed to a military
attack. Beginning on January 1, 1990, according to the US-Panama treaty,
the head of the canal administration would have to be a Panamanian
citizen, proposed by Panama and approved by the US government. This was a
transaction which Bush wished to conduct with a puppet state, and not with
an independent government. In the light of transparent US preparations for
a short-term invasion or other armed incursion, the National Assembly of
Panama passed a resolution of December 15 to take note of the state of
affairs that had now been forced upon Panama by Bush. The statement was
designed to permit the assumption of emergency powers by the Panamanian
government to meet the crisis, and was in no way equivalent to a
declaration of war under international law, no more than Bush's April 6,
1989 declaration of a US state of emergency over the Panamanian situation
had been. "The Republic of Panama," the statement read, "has for the last
two years suffered a cruel and constant harassment by the US government,
whose president has made use of the powers of war...to try to subject the
will of Panamanians....The Republic of Panama is living under a genuine
state of war, under the permanent hounding of the US government, whose
soldiers not only daily violate the integrity of the Torrijos-Carter
treaties... but trample our sovereign rights in open, arrogant, and
shameless violation of the pacts and norms of international
law....Therefore be it resolved that the Republic of Panama be declared in
a state of war, for as long as the aggression unleashed against the
Panamanian people by the US government continues." [fn 43] The first
comment from White House spokesman Marlin Fitzwater was to minimize this
declaration: "I don't think anybody here considers it important enough in
terms of impact," Fitzwater told the White House press corps. It was only
after Bush had given the final order to attack that it was discovered that
this statement had been another casus belli.
At this point, the US provocation
activity was stepped up, with special attention given to the approaches to
Noriega's headquarters, the Commandancia. Here, at the Avenue A PDF
checkpoint, on the evening of Saturday, December 16, Navy Lieutenant Adam
J. Curtis and his wife Bonnie had been detained as they chose to take an
evening stroll in this very tense and highly sensitive neighborhood. Their
presence could in no way have been interpreted as purely casual. Then,
while Lieutenant and Mrs. Curtis were having their identity checked by the
PDF, a car occupied by four other "off-duty" American officers in civilian
clothes drove up. These officers would later say that they had taken a
wrong turn towards Noriega's Commandancia, where the cat and mouse game of
would-be kidnappers and their prey was known to go on at all hours. These
US officers alleged that the PDF guards had ordered them to get out of
their car at gunpoint. But the US officers also admitted that they
attempted to depart from the area of the PDF checkpoint at high speed, and
it is not clear in which direction they were headed. The US officers' car
did succeed in departing the scene. At this point, according to the US
account, the PDF guards opened fire and wounded Marine Lieutenant Robert
Paz, who is later reported to have died of his wounds at the US Gorgas
Military Hospital. Another US officer in the car was reportedly slightly
wounded in the leg.
When Lieutenant and Mrs. Curtis were
released by the PDF some four hours later, they alleged that Lieutenant
Curtis had been beaten, and Mrs. Curtis fondled and sexually threatened by
the PDF. These details, which may have been purely invented, were
obsessively seized upon by Bush in his public justifications of the US
invasion. Published accounts indicate that the public affairs officer of
the US Southern Command suggested that Lieut. Curtis be interviewed on
television to recount his story, but that this idea had been quickly
vetoed by Defense Secretary Cheney, suggesting that the US command
authority had its doubts about Curtis's ability to tell a tale useful for
the Bush regime's propaganda mill. [fn 44]
With the incidents at Avenue A, the
imposing "mind war" and "mind control" apparatus of the US regime went
into action. Here Bush was taking a leaf from the book of his father's
protege, Adolf Hitler. When Hitler had wished to invade Poland, he first
completed his military preparations and then staged the infamous
provocation code-named Operation Canned Meat at the Gleiwitz radio station
on the German side of the border with Poland. The Nazis took some German
convicts from a jail, murdered them, and then dressed them in Polish
uniforms. These bodies were then presented to the press as the result of a
murderous Polish raid across the border. Within hours, Hitler had issued
an early-morning declaration of war. Bush showed that his pedigree had
been acquired in the same school.
Bush gave the final order for the attack
on Sunday, December 17. He made a series of raving statements about the
alleged sexual molestation of Mrs. Curtis, and it was evident that racist
hysteria was being actively elicited. In his speech delivered at 7:20 AM
on December 21, 1989 announcing the US invasion, Bush said: *
Many attempts have been made to resolve
this crisis through diplomacy and negotiations. All were rejected by the
dictator of Panama, General Manuel Noriega, an indicted drug trafficker.
Last Friday, Noriega declared his
military dictatorship to be in a state of war with the United States and
publicly threatened the lives of Americans in Panama. The very next day
forces under his command shot and killed an unarmed American serviceman,
wounded another, arrested and brutally beat a third American serviceman
and then brutally interrogated his wife, threatening her with sexual
abuse. That was enough. [fn 45]
On December 22, Bush was asked what had
made him decide to launch the attack now. He replied:
I think what changed my mind was the
events that I cited in briefing the American people on this yesterday: the
death of the Marine, the brutalizing, really obscene torture of the Navy
lieutenant, and the threat of sexual abuse and the terror inflicted on
that Navy lieutenant's wife.... [fn 46]
Later in the same press conference Bush
obsessively returned to the same topic, this time answering a question
about the Soviet reaction to the US move:
And I also need to let him [Gorbachov]
know-- look, if an American marine is killed, if they kill an American
Marine-- that's real bad. And if they threaten and brutalize the wife of
an American citizen, sexually threatening the lieutenant's wife while
kicking him in the groin over and over again, then, Mr. Gorbachov, please
understand, this president is going to do something about it."
Blacks and mestizos make up the vast
majority of the population of Panama. The principal enemy image was
constructed around the figure of Noriega, who was ridiculed as "the
pineapple" in the US media loyal to Bush. Noriega was not however the only
target: Francisco Rodriguez, the pro-Noriega President of Panama, was,
like Noriega, a mestizo, while the minister of government and justice, the
minister of the treasury, and the minister of labor were all black. The
foreign minister was of Chinese background, as was the head of the small
air force. A number of Noriega's leading PDF colleagues were black. By
contrast, Guillermo Endara, the new US puppet president who was now
administered his oath of office by US military officers on a US military
base, was white, and lily-white was his retinue, including first vice
president Ricardo Arias Calderon and second vice president Guillermo
"Billy" Ford. There would be only one non-white in the new Endara cabinet,
a black woman who was minister of education. The rest of the US assets
belonged to the lily-white oligarchy of Panama, the rabiblancos or
"cottontails," who had ruled the country with supreme incompetence and
maximum corruption until the advent of the nationalist revolution of Gen.
Omar Torrijos, Noriega's patron, in 1968. Endara's base was among the "BMW
revolutionaries" who had attended anti-Noriega rallies only in the comfort
of their air-conditioned limousines. These were Bush's kind of people. One
of Bush's soldatesca in Panama, General Marc Cisneros, boasted that the
Panamanians "need to have a little infusion of Anglo values."
The US military operations, which got
under way just after midnight on Tuesday, were conducted with unusual
ferocity. The officers were obsessed with avoiding a repetition of the
fiasco of Desert One on 1980, or the fratricidal casualties of Grenada.
Mad Max Thurman sent in the new Stealth and A-7 fighter-bombers, and AC-13
gunships. The neighborhood around Noriega's Commandancia, called El
Chorillo, was bombarded with a vengeance and virtually razed, as was the
working-class district of San Miguelito, and large parts of the city of
Colon. US commanders had been instructed that Bush wished to avoid US
casualties at all costs, and that any hostile fire was to be answered by
overwhelming US firepower, without regard to the number of civilian
casualties that this might produce among the Panamanians. Many of the
Panamanian civilian dead were secretly buried in unmarked mass graves
during the dead of night by the US forces; many other bodies were consumed
in the holocaust of fires that leveled El Chorillo. The Institute of
Seismology counted 417 bomb bursts in Panama City alone during the first
14 hours of the US invasion. For many days there were no US estimates of
the civilian dead (or "collateral damage"), and eventually the Bush regime
set the death toll for Panamanian non-combatants at slightly over 200. In
reality, as Executive Intelligence Review and former US Attorney General
Ramsay Clark pointed out, there had been approximately 5,000 innocent
civilian victims, including large numbers of women and children.
US forces rounded up 10,000 suspected
political opponents of "democracy" and incarcerated them in concentration
camps, calling many of them prisoners of war. Many political prisoners
were held for months after the invasion without being charged with any
specific offense, a clear violation of the norms of habeas corpus. The
combined economic devastation caused by 30 months of US sanctions and
economic warfare, plus the results of bombardments, firefights, and
torchings, had taken an estimated $7 billion out of the Panamanian
economy, in which severe poverty was the lot of most of the population
apart from the rabiblanco bankers that were the main support for Bush's
intervention. The bombing left 15,000 homeless. The Endara government
purged several thousand government officials and civil servants under the
pretext that they had been tainted by their association with Noriega.
Ironically, the new US puppet regime could only be described as a
congeries of drug pushers and drug money launderers. The most succinct
summary was provided by the International Herald Tribune on February 7,
1990, which reported: "The nation's new President Guillermo Endara has for
years been a director of one of the Panamanian banks used by Colombia's
drug traffickers. Guillermo Ford, the second vice president and chairman
of the banking commission, is a part owner of the Dadeland Bank of
Florida, which was named in a court case two years ago as a central
financial institution for one of the biggest Medellin money-launderers,
Gonzalo Mora. Rogelio Cruz, the new Attorney General, has been a director
of the First Interamericas Bank, owned by Rodrguez Orejuela, one of the
bosses of the Cali Cartel gang in Colombia." The portly Endara was also
the business partner and corporate attorney of Carlos Eleta Almaran, the
CIA bagman already mentioned. Eleta Almaran, the owner of the Panamanian
branch of Philip Morris tobacco was arraigned in Bibb County, Georgia by
DEA officials who accused him of conspiracy to import 600 kilos of cocaine
per month into the US, and to set up dummy corporations to launder the
estimated $300 million in profits this project was expected to produce.
Eleta was first freed on $8 million bail; after the "successful" US
invasion of Panama, all charges against him were ordered dropped by Bush
and Thornburgh. Bush's heart had gone out in his December 21 war speech
especially to drug pusher Billy Ford: "You remember those horrible
pictures of newly elected Vice President Ford covered head to toe with
blood, beaten mercilessly by so-called 'dignity battalions.'" Bush, it
would appear, has never wanted to beat up a drug pusher.
As for Endara's first vice president,
Ricardo Arias Calderon, his brother, Jaime Arias Calderon, was president
of the First Interamericas bank when that bank was controlled by the Cali
cartel. Jaime Arias Calderon was also the co-owner of the Banco
Continental, which laundered $40 million in drug money, part of which was
used to finance the activities of the anti-Noriega opposition. Thus, all
of Bush's most important newly-installed puppets were implicated in drug
dealing.
The invasion presented some very
difficult moments for Bush. From the beginning of the operation late on
December 20, until Christmas eve, the imposing US martial apparatus had
proven incapable of locating and capturing Noriega. The US Southern
Command was terrorized when a few Noriega loyalists launched a surprise
attack on US headquarters with mortars, scattering the media personnel who
had been grinding out their propaganda.
There was great fear through the US
command that Noriega had successfully implemented a plan for the PDF to
melt away to arms cashes and secret bases in the Panamanian jungle for a
prolonged guerilla warfare effort. As it turned out, Noriega had failed to
give the order to disperse. The reason for this is most instructive:
Noriega had expected a US move, but refused to credit the overwhelming
evidence that the US was launching a full-scale invasion for the purpose
of completely dismantling the PDF and occupying the totality of Panamanian
territory. Noriega remained convinced until very late in the day that US
aggression would be limited to a commando raid devoted primarily to the
kidnapping or assassination of Noriega and a few top lieutenants. In this,
Noriega joins the company of the Shah of Iran, President Marcos of the
Philippines, and Saddam Hussein of Iraq, all of whom were unable to fathom
the true extent of the US commitment to topple their regimes (or, in the
case of Iraq, lay waste to much of the country). This is the principal
reason why the PDF failed to execute its plan to disperse and regroup in
the jungle.
As Christmas eve approached, and Noriega
still had not been eliminated, a whining hysteria increasingly colored
Bush's public pronouncements. In his press conference of December 22, Bush
was tremendously agitated, and opened the proceedings by complaining: "I
have a brief press statement, to be followed by a brief press conference
because I have a pain in the neck. Seriously." Bush refused to discuss the
details of this pain. Was it a symptom of the thyroid condition that was
diagnosed in early May of 1991? That is difficult to determine, but there
was no mistaking Bush's hyperthyroid mood. His response to the inevitable
first question about tracking down the demonized Noriega:
I've been frustrated that he's been in
power this long-- extraordinarily frustrated. The good news: he's out of
power. The bad news: he has not yet been brought to justice. So I'd have
to say, there is a certain level of frustration on this account. The good
news, though. is that the government's beginning to function, and the man
controls no forces, and he's out. But, yes, I won't be satisfied until we
see him come to justice.
Noriega was irrelevant, Bush tried to suggest, since his government and
army had both ceased to exist, but Bush lacked conviction. He feared a
long Christmas day spent by at home by 80 million families, with no news
except the football scores and the mortified consternation of the US
regime Noriega had managed to elude. Then, on the evening of December 24,
it was reported that Noriega, armed with an Uzi machine gun, had made his
way unchallenged and undetected to the Papal Nunciatura in Panama City
where he had asked for and obtained political asylum. There are no reports
of how far George Bush gnawed into the White House Bigelows upon hearing
that news, but it is clear that there was important damage to the deep
pile in the Oval Office.
The standoff that then developed
encapsulated the hereditary war of the Bush family with the Holy See and
the Roman Catholic Church. For eight days, US troops surrounded the
Nunciatura, which they proceeded to bombard with deafening decibels of
explicitly satanic heavy metal and other hard rock music, which according
to some reports had been personally chosen by mad Max Thurman in order to
"unnerve Noriega and the Nuncio," Monsignor LaBoa. Noriega was reputed to
be an opera lover.
At the same time, Bush ordered the State
Department to carry out real acts of thuggery in making threatening
representations to the Holy See. It became clear that Roman Catholic
priests, nuns, monks and prelates would soon be in danger in many
countries of Ibero-America. Nevertheless, the Vatican declined to expel
Noriega from the Nunciatura in accordance with US demands. Bush's forces
in Panama had shown they were ready to play fast and loose with diplomatic
immunity. A number of foreign embassies were broken into by US troops
while they were frantically searching for Noriega, and the Cuban and
Nicaraguan Embassies were ringed with tanks and troops in a ham-handed
gesture of intimidation. It is clear that in this context, Bush
contemplated the storming of the Nunciatura by US forces. Perhaps he was
deterred by the worldwide political consequences he would have faced. When
the German Wehrmacht occupied Rome during the war years of 1943-44, Hitler
had never dared to order an incursion into the sovereign territory of the
Vatican. Could Bush face the opprobrium of having ordered what Hitler
himself had ruled out? At this point, Bush's criminal energy failed him,
and he had to look for other options.
These were difficult days for Bush. On
December 27, he gave another press conference during which he was asked:
Q: Do you fear that Mr. Noriega might
disclose any CIA information that could embarrass you or the government?
Bush: No.
Q: Nothing whatsoever?
Bush: I don't think so. I think that's
history and I think that the main thing is that he should be tried and
brought to justice and we are pursuing that course with no fear of that.
You know, we may get into some release of certain confidential documents,
that he may try to blind side the whole justice process, but the system
works, so I wouldn't worry about that.
Q: Would you open up any documents that
he might request so that there'd be no question as there has been in other
cases?
Bush: There would be enough to see that
he's given a totally fair trial.
New Year's Day was excruciating for Bush,
since this was another holiday spent at home with football scores yielding
only to speculation on how long Noriega would elude Bush's legions. The
manifest refusal of the Vatican to expel Noriega seemed to deprive Bush's
aggression of its entire moral justification: if Noriega was what Bush
claimed, why did the Pope John Paul II decline to honor the imperative US
demand for custody? While Bush squirmed in agony waiting for the Rose Bowl
to end, he began to think once again of People Power.
In Panama City, the Endara-Ford-Arias
Calderon forces mobilized their BMW base and hired hundreds of those who
had nothing to eat for militant demonstrations outside of the Nunciatura.
These were liberally seeded with US special forces and other commandos in
civilian clothes. As the demonstrations grew more menacing, and the US
troops and tanks made no move to restrain them, it was clear that the US
forces were preparing to stage a violent but "spontaneous" assault by the
masses on the Nunciatura that would include the assassination of Noriega
and the small group of his co-workers who had accompanied him into that
building. At about this time Msgr. Laboa warned Noriega, "you could be
lynched like Mussolini." Noriega appears to have concluded that remaining
in the Nunciatura meant certain death for himself and his subordinates at
the hands of the US commandos operating under the cover of the mob. LaBoa
and the other religious on the staff of the Nunciatura would also be in
grave danger. On January 3, 1990, after thanking LaBoa and giving him a
letter to the Pope, Noriega, dressed in his general's uniform, left the
Nunciatura and surrendered to Gen. Cisneros.
In Bush's speech of December 20 he had
offered the following justification for his act of war, Operation Just
Cause:
The goals of the United States have been
to safeguard the lives of Americans, to defend democracy in Panama, to
combat drug trafficking, and to protect the integrity of the Panama Canal
Treaty.
If these were the goals, then Bush's
invasion of Panama must be counted not only a crime, but also a failure.
On April 5, 1991, newspapers all over
Latin American carried details of a new report by the US Drug Enforcement
Administration confirming that the US-installed puppet president of
Panama, Guillermo Endara, had been an officer of at least six companies
which had been demonstrably implicated in laundering drug money. These
were the Banco General, the Banco de Colombia, the Union Bank of
Switzerland, the Banco Aleman, the Primer Banco de Ahorros, Sudameris,
Banaico, and the Banco del Istmo. The money laundered came from a drug
smuggling ring headed up by Augusto Falcon and Sahvador Magluta of
Colombia, who are reported to have smuggled an average of one ton of
cocaine per month into Florida during the decade 1977-87, including many
of the years during which Bush's much-touted South Florida Task Force and
related operations were in operation.
With the puppet president so heavily
implicated in the activity of the international drug mafia, it can be no
surprise that the plague of illegal drugs has markedly worsened in the
wake of Bush's invasion. According to the London Independent of March 5,
1991, "statistics now indicate that since General Noriega's departure,
cocaine trafficking has, in fact, prospered" in the country. On March 1,
the State Department had conceded that the turnover of drug money
laundered in Panama had at least regained the levels attained before the
1989 invasion. According to the Los Angeles Times of April 28, 1991,
current levels of drug trafficking in Panama "in some cases exceed" what
existed before the December 20 invasion, and US officials "say the trend
is sharply upward and includes serious movements by the Colombian cartels
into areas largely ignored under Noriega." This was all real drug
activity, and not the cornmeal tamales wrapped in banana leaves that
Bush's mind war experts found in one of Noriega's residences and labeled
as "cocaine" during the invasion.
Bush's invasion of Panama has done
nothing to fight the scourge of illegal narcotics. Rather, the fact that
so many of Bush's hand-picked puppets can be shown to be top figures in
the drug mafia suggests that drug trafficking through Panama towards the
United States has increased after the ouster of Noriega. If drug shipments
to the United States have increased, this exposes Bush's pledge to
"protect the lives of Americans" as a lie.
As far as the promise of democracy is
concerned, it must be stressed that Panama has remained under direct US
military dictatorship and virtual martial law until this writing in the
late autumn of 1991, two years after Bush's adventure was launched. The
congressional and local elections that were conducted during early 1991
were thoroughly orchestrated by the US occupation forces. Army
intelligence units interrogated potential voters, and medical battalions
handed out vaccines and medicines to urban and rural populations to
encourage them to vote. Every important official in the Panamanian
government from Endara on down has US military "liaison officers" assigned
on a permanent basis. These officers are from the Defense Department's
Civic Action-Country Area Team (or CA-CAT), a counterinsurgency and
"nation building" apparatus that parallels the "civic action" teams
unleashed during the Vietnam war. CA-CAT officers supervise all government
ministries and even supervise police precincts in Panama City. The
Panamanian Defense Forces have been dissolved, and the CA-CAT officers are
busily creating a new constabulary, the Fuerza Publica. During December
1990 and January 1991, as the US-led coalition was about to launch its
attacks into Iraq, large-scale military demonstrations were staged by the
US forces in the provinces of Chiriqui, Bocas del Toro, Panama, and Colon
for the purpose of intimidating the large Arab populations of these areas,
which the US suspected of sympathizing with Iraq. Radio stations and
newspapers which spoke out against the US invasion or criticized the
puppet regime were jailed or intimidated, as in the case of the publisher
Escolastico Calvo, who was held in concentration camps and jails for some
months after the invasion without an arrest warrant and without specific
charges. Trade union rights are non-existent: after a demonstration by
100,000 persons in December, 1990 had protested growing unemployment and
Endara's plans to "privatize" the state sector by selling it off for a
song to the rabiblanco bankers, all of the labor leaders who had organized
the march were fired from their jobs, and arrest warrants were issued
against 100 union officials by the government. But even the pervasive
military presence has not been sufficient to re-establish stability in
Panama: on December 5, 1990, heavily armed US forces were sent into the
streets of Panama City to deter a coup d'etat that was allegedly being
prepared by Eduardo Herrera, the former chief of police. As the popularity
of "Porky" Endara wanes, there are signs that the Bush State Department is
grooming a possible successor in Gabriel Lewis Galindo, the owner of the
Banco del Istmo, one of the banks involved in drug money laundering.
In the wake of Bush's invasion, the
economy of Panama has not been rebuilt, but has rather collapsed further
into immiseration. The Bush administration has set as the first imperative
for the puppet regime the maintenance of debt service on Panama's $6
billion in international debt. Debt service payments take precedence over
spending on public works, public health, and all other categories. Bush
had promised Panama $2 billion for post-invasion reconstruction, but he
later reduced this to $1 billion. What was finally forthcoming was just
$460 million, most of which was simply transferred to the Wall Street
banks in order to defray the debt service owed by Panama. The figure of
$460 scarcely exceeds the $400 in Panamanian holdings that were supposedly
frozen by the US during the period of economic warfare against Noriega,
but which were then given to the New York banks, also for debt service
payments.
As far as the integrity of the Panama
Canal Treaty signed by Torrijos and Carter, and ratified by the US Senate
is concerned, a resolution co-sponsored by Republican Senator Bob Dole of
Kansas and GOP Congressman Phil Crane of Illinois is currently before the
Congress which calls on Bush to renegotiate the treaty so as to allow US
military forces to remain in Panama beyond the current deadline of
December 31, 1999. Since no Panamanian government could re-open
negotiations on the treaty and survive, this strategy, which appears to
enjoy the support of the Bush White House, implies a US military
occupation of not just the old Canal Zone, but of all of Panama, for the
entire foreseeable future.
Thus, on every point enumerated by Bush
as basic to his policy-- the lives of Americans, Panamanian democracy,
anti-drug operations, and the integrity of the treaty-- Bush has obtained
a fiasco. Bush's invasion of Panama will stand as a chapter of shame and
infamy in the recent history of the United States.
As this book goes to press, the
prosecution is presenting its case in the trial of Gen. Noriega in Miami,
Florida. These proceedings have been a shocking demonstration of the
politically-motivated, police-state frameups that are now the rule in US
courts. Noriega was brought into the United States through a violent
exercise in international kidnapping. In any case, Noriega's undeniable
status as a prisoner of war means that under the Geneva Convention he
cannot be held criminally responsible in a United States court for actions
that antedate the opening of hostilities between the United States and
Panama. These overarching considerations set the stage for a series of
scandalous abuses within the framework of the trial itself. As a result of
the Bush regime's "mind war" conducted in cooperation with the controlled
news media, it is clear that Noriega cannot receive a fair trial anywhere
in the United States, because of the impossibility of finding an impartial
jury. During the time that Noriega was preparing his defense, the US
Department of Justice and the FBI violated the rights of the defendant
under the Sixth Amendment by tapping and taping his conversations with his
defense lawyers. Attorney Raymond Takiff had been retained by Noriega as a
lawyer at the same time that he was working for the US Department of
Justice as a secret informant in undercover sting operations. In his
outrageously political pre-trial opinions, US District Judge William
Hoeveler barred all references to Noriega's dealings with CIA Director and
Vice President George Bush, ruling that the Noriega-Bush relation was
irrelevant to the US government's charge that Noriega was part of drug
smuggling into the United States. Hoeveler's pre-trial ruling amounts to a
ban on discussion of wrongdoing by the US government. This guts Noriega's
defense, which is that US agencies, and not Noriega, were responsible for
the importation of illegal narcotics into the United States as an integral
part of the US government's policy of supporting the Nicaraguan contras,
and that the US government fabricated the February, 1988 indictments
against Noriega as part of a political strategy to overthrow him because
he refused to join the US in supporting the contras.
The parade of government witnesses
against Noriega includes the usual rogue's gallery of professional
perjurers from the Federal Witness Protection Program. Those testifying
against Noriega are, almost without exception, felons at the mercy of the
US government, many of whom have concluded plea bargains with federal
prosecutors in which they have been treated more leniently in exchange for
their willingness to testify against Noriega. These professional witnesses
constitute a phalanx of CIA stringers and other mercenaries of the perjury
wars who have received total payments of US taxpayers' money estimated
anywhere between $1.5 million and $6 million. The upkeep of this stable of
witnesses and other exorbitant court costs are not being defrayed by the
Bush presidential campaign nor by Bush personally, despite the fact that
the main purpose of the proceedings is to retroactively validate Bush's
atrocity of December, 1989, and to contribute to his efforts at
self-glorification for re-election in 1992. Judge Hoeveler has abrogated
the usual rules of evidence, admitting hearsay reports on Noriega's
activities from celebrity felons like Carlos Lehder who have never met nor
spoken with Noriega. Despite this unprecedented mobilization of the police
state apparatus, news media like US News and World Report of September 23,
1991 have conceded that the Justice Department case against Noriega is
"shockingly weak," and legal experts not friendly to Noriega have asserted
that the first month of the prosecution case had utterly failed to provide
convincing evidence of any violations of US law by Noriega.
Bush's performance during the Panama
crisis was especially ominous because of the president's clearly emerging
mental imbalance. Several outbursts during the Noriega press conferences
had resembled genuine public fits. Racist and sexual obsessions were
reaching critical mass in Bush's subconscious. These gross phenomena did
not receive the attention they would have merited from journalists,
television commentators, and pundits, who rather preferred studiously to
ignore them. One public figure who called attention to Bush's
psychopathology was political prisoner Lyndon LaRouche, who made the
following courageous observations from a jail cell in a federal prison in
Minnesota after viewing several of Bush's press briefings during the last
days of December:
George is a very shallow-minded person,
very impulsive. He's a person of rage-driven obsession, and impulses
flowing from rage-driven obsessions. Very shallow-minded. He's sort of a
jock of one kind or another, in his mentality. He talks like it, he acts
like it, his body language is that of it. He can't present a concept. The
man is incapable of carrying a concept in his head. He's a poor little
fellow who's so rage-driven that very little intellectual activity can
occur in his head; that's his conceptual style. He's a man characterized
by sudden fits of jock-style rage, of obsessions which flow from seizure
by that rage, and of impulses which flow from those obsessions.
If you were a psychiatrist and you had
such a fellow on your couch, what's your prognosis of the way he's going
to react to this situation? He'll react only when he becomes sly. And he
becomes sly in the face of great pressure. He'll duck, he'll be sneaky,
when he faces something he knows he can't cope with. And he'll duck and
hope to come back to hit another day.
But now he's in a manic fit. He's the
President. He said so at his press conference. "I'm the President. I'm
Queen of the May." So you've got a rage-driven man, with rage-driven
obsession with impulses flowing from that, in a man who thinks he's the
Queen of the May. In other words, in Aeschylean language, A LAW UNTO
HIMSELF. What's your prognosis? [fn 47]
It was during these waning days of 1989
that Bush's mental disintegration became unmistakable, foreshadowing the
greater furors yet to come.
NOTES:
1. Washington Post, January 21, 1991.
2. Evans and Novak, "A Note From Saddle
River," Washington Post, April 10, 1989.
3. For Fukuyama's "End of History," see
The National Interest, Summer, 1989, and Henry Allen, "The End. Or Is
It?", Washington Post, September 27, 1989.
4. Washington Post, December 8, 1988
5. Washington Post, April 17, 1989
6. See Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta,
"Another Test of Loyalty and Standards," Washington Post, April 26, 1989
and "Overseas Spoils for GOP Loyalists," Washington Post, September 22,
1989; and Ann Devroy, "Bush Ambassadorial Nomination in Limbo," Washington
Post, September 12, 1989.
7. "Off on the Wrong Foot: Gray takes on
Baker," Newsweek, April 10, 1989.
8. "Bush's Earthly Pursuits," Washington
Post, November 18, 1988.
9. See the transcript of Bush's statement
and news conference, Washington Post, February 7, 1989; "With Signs and
Ceremony, S&L Bailout Begins," Washington Post, August 10, 1989; and
"Bush: S&Ls May Need More Help," Washington Post, December 12, 1989.
10. "Bush Backs Increase in IMF Funds,"
Washington Post, November 23, 1989.
11. "President Defends Pace of
Administration," Washington Post, March 8, 1989.
12. See House Democratic Study Group,
Special Report No. 101-45, "Legislation Vetoed by the President," p. 83.
13. Washington Post, April 29, 1990, p.
F1.
14. John M. Barry, The Ambition and the
Power, (New York: Viking Press, 1989), pp. 621-622.
15. Barry, The Ambition and the Power, p.
642.
16. "Bush: The Secret Presidency,"
Newsweek, January 1, 1990.
17. "Transcript of President Bush's Press
Conference," Washington Post, June 9, 1989.
18. Bush press conference, Washington
Post, December 22, 1989.
19. "Manuevering Marks Eve of 'Education
Summit'", Washington Post, September 27, 1989.
20. Kevin Phillips, "George Bush and
Congress-- Brain-Dead Politics of '89," Washington Post, October 1, 1989.
21. Time, October 23, 1989.
22. "Bush Attacks Critics of Response to
Coup," Washington Post, October 14, 1989.
23. Congressional Record, 58th Congress,
3d session, p. 19.
24. See "Police State and Global
Gendarme: The United States under the Thornburgh Doctrine," American
Leviathan, pp. 61-102.
25. Kenneth J. Jones, The Enemy Within, (Cali,
Colombia: Carvajal, 1990), p. 22.
26. Frederick Kempe, "The Noriega Files,"
Newsweek, January 15, 1990.
27. Kempe, "The Noriega Files," p. 19.
28. Frank A. Rubino Esq. and Jon A. May,
Esq., Classified Information Procedures Act Submission in United States of
America vs. General manuel A. Noriega, United States District Court,
Southern District of Florida, Case No. 89-79-CR-HOEVELER, March 18, 1991,
hereafter cited as Noriega CIPA proffer.
29. "Bush Returned Noriega to Payroll,
Turner Says," Washington Post, October 1, 1988.
30. Mike Blair, "Mossad Silent Partner,"
The Spotlight, May 13, 1991.
31. Noriega CIPA proffer, p. 82.
32. Kempe, "The Noriega Files," p. 23.
33. Noriega CIPA proffer, p. 52.
34. Noriega CIPA proffer, p. 54-55.
35. "The Bush-Noriega Relationship,"
Newsweek, January 15, 1990, pp. 16-17, including the photo of the
Bush-Noriega meeting.
36. "Panama: Atrocities of the 'Big
Stick,'" in American Leviathan: Administrative Fascism under the Bush
Regime, (Wiesbaden: EIR News Service, 1990), pp. 39-40.
37. For Gregg's testimony on Bush-Noriega
relations, see "Testimony on Bush Meeting With Panama Ambassador," New
York Times, May 21, 1988.
38. ""Bush Aide Invokes Executive
Privilege," Washington Post, May 20, 1988.
39. American Leviathan, pp. 41-42.
40. "Ex-Bush Aide Is Said to Have Advised
Noriega," Washington Post, January 22, 1989.
41. "Bush Presses to Cut Off Talks with
Noriega," Washington Post, May 20, 1988.
42. Bob Woodward, The Commanders, (New
York: Simon and Shuster, 1991), p. 89.
43. See "Fact Sheet on the US Invasion of
Panama," American Leviathan, p. 46.
44. The Commanders, p. 161.
45. Text of President Bush's Address,
Washington Post, December 21, 1989.
46. Text of Bush press conference,
Washington Post, December 22, 1989.
47. What Does Candidate LaRouche Think of
Bush's Mental Health? (Washington: Democrats for Economic Recovery-LaRouche
in '92), p. 7.
Go To Chapter 24