|
by Nicholas Roerich Museum, New York
Early Years
Nicholas
Konstantinovich Roerich was born in St. Petersburg, Russia, on October 9,
1874, the first-born son of lawyer and notary, Konstantin Roerich and his
wife Maria. He was raised in the comfortable environment of an upper
middle-class Russian family with its advantages of contact with the
writers, artists, and scientists who often came to visit the Roerichs. At
an early age he showed a curiosity and talent for a variety of activities.
When he was nine, a noted archeologist came to conduct explorations in the
region and took young Roerich on his excavations of the local tumuli. The
adventure of unveiling the mysteries of forgotten eras with his own hands
sparked an interest in archeology that would last his lifetime. Through
other contacts he developed interests in collecting prehistoric artifacts,
coins, and minerals, and built his own arboretum for the study of plants
and trees. While still quite young, Roerich showed a particular aptitude
for drawing, and by the time he reached the age of sixteen he began to
think about entering the Academy of Art and pursuing a career as an
artist. His father did not consider painting to be a fit vocation for a
responsible member of society, however, and insisted that his son follow
his own steps in the study of law. A compromise was reached, and in the
fall of 1893 Nicholas enrolled simultaneously in the Academy of Art and at
St. Petersburg University.
In 1895 Roerich met
the prominent writer, critic, and historian, Vladimir Stasov. Through him
he was introduced to many of the composers and artists of the time --
Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Stravinsky, and the basso Fyodor Chaliapin.
At concerts at the Court Conservatory he heard the works of Glazunov,
Liadov, Arensky, Wagner, Scriabin, and Prokofiev for the first time, and
an avid enthusiasm for music was developed. Wagner in particular appealed
to him, and later, during his career as a theater designer, he created
designs for most of that composer's operas. Moreover, musical terms and
analogies can appropriately be applied to Roerich's painting. He
frequently related music to the use of color and color harmonies, and
applied this sense to his designs for opera. As Nina Selivanova wrote in
her book, The World of Roerich: “The original force of Roerich's work
consists in a masterly and marked symmetry and a definite rhythm, like the
melody of an epic song.”
The late 1890's saw
a blossoming in Russian arts, particularly in St. Petersburg, where the
avant-garde was forming groups and alliances, led by the young Sergei
Diaghilev, who was a year or two ahead of Roerich at law school and was
among the first to appreciate his talents as a painter and student of the
Russian past.
One of Diaghilev's
first achievements was the founding, with Princess Maria Tenisheva and
others, of the magazine The World of Art. This magazine enjoyed a
relatively short life but had an important influence in Russian art
circles. The magazine declared itself the enemy of the academicians, the
sentimentalists, and the realists. It introduced to its readership, which
was made up mostly of the intelligentsia, the vital elements of Russian
artistic circles, European post-impressionism, and the modernist movement.
Roerich contributed to it and sat on its editorial board. Other Russian
painters involved were Alexandre Benois and Leon Bakst, who later became
Roerich's co-workers in the early days of Diaghilev's Ballets Russes.
After finishing his
university thesis, Roerich planned to set off for a year in Europe to
visit the museums, exhibitions, studios, and salons of Paris and Berlin.
Just before leaving he met Helena, daughter of the architect Shaposhnikov
and niece of the composer Mussorgsky. There seems to have been an
immediate mutual attraction, and they were soon engaged to be married. On
his return from Europe their marriage took place.
Helena Roerich was
an unusually gifted woman, a talented pianist, and author of many books,
including The Foundations of Buddhism and a Russian translation of Helena
Blavatsky's Secret Doctrine. Her collected Letters, in two volumes, are an
example of the wisdom, spiritual insight, and simple advice she shared
with a multitude of correspondents -- friends, foes, and co-workers alike.
Later, in New York,
Nicholas and Helena Roerich founded the Agni Yoga Society, which espoused
a living ethic encompassing and synthesizing the philosophies and
religious teachings of all ages.
Prompted by the need
to provide some income for his new household, Roerich applied for and won
the position of Secretary of the School of the Society for the
Encouragement of Art, later becoming its head, the first of many positions
that Roerich would occupy as a teacher and spokesman for the arts.
Roerich determined
to overhaul the Society and rescue it from the academic mediocrity it had
foundered in for many years. He instituted a system of training in art
that seems revolutionary even by today's standards: to teach all the arts
-- painting, music, singing, dance, theater, and the so-called “industrial
arts”, such as ceramics, painting on porcelain, pottery, and mechanical
drawing -- under one roof, and to give his faculty free rein to design
their own curriculum.
The
cross-fertilization of the arts that Roerich promoted was evidence of his
inclination to harmonize, bring together, and find correspondences between
apparent conflicts or opposites in all areas of life. This was a hallmark
of his thinking, and one sees it demonstrated in all the disciplines he
explored. He constantly sought to break down compartmentalization, and,
indeed, even in his own art he defied categorization and created a
universe uniquely personal. In his writings on ethics also, it can be seen
that he constantly sought to connect ethical problems with scientific
knowledge of the surrounding world.
It was Roerich's
gift that these “connections” appeared so natural to him and presented
themselves in all life's manifestations. And it was this talent for
synthesis, which he admired in others and encouraged in the young, that
enabled him to correlate the subjective with the objective, the
philosophical with the scientific, Eastern wisdom with Western knowledge,
and to build bridges of understanding between such apparent
contradictions. He reminded us that these contradictions were often the
result of man's ignorance, and that an expanding consciousness, which each
individual was duty-bound to pursue, would lead to eventual recognition of
the illusoriness, or relativity, of things. As Garabed Paelian affirms in
his book Nicholas Roerich: Roerich “...learned things ignored by other
men; perceived relations between seemingly isolated phenomena, and
unconsciously felt the presence of an unknown treasure.” Perhaps it is
this “unknown treasure” that in Roerich's paintings speaks to the viewer
who is attuned to that underlying meaning, and further explains the
transcendental feelings that some experience through his canvases.
In 1902, the
Roerichs celebrated the birth of their first son, George, and in the
summers of 1903 and 1904, they set off on an extended tour of forty cities
throughout Russia. Roerich's purpose was to contrast the styles and
historical context of Russian architecture. The voyage was one of
discovery, for wherever they went he was able to locate the remnants of
Russia's past -- ancient monuments, churches, city walls, and castles. He
found that these had, in many instances, been neglected for centuries. As
an archeologist and art historian he was aware of what an important key
they were to Russia's cultural history. He determined to draw attention to
the situation and somehow arrange to have them protected and preserved,
and with this goal in mind painted a series of seventy-five works
depicting the structures. The experience of this journey had a lasting
effect, for on his return in 1904, Roerich promulgated the plan that he
hoped would create protection everywhere for such cultural treasures, a
plan consummated thirty-one years later in the Roerich Pact. This kind of
thinking was not common in those days, and anticipated the importance
that, today, most countries of the world place upon preservation of their
cultural heritage.
In 1904 Roerich
painted the first of his paintings on religious themes. These mostly dealt
with Russian saints and legends, and included Message to Tiron, Fiery
Furnace, and The Last Angel, subjects that he returned to with numerous
variants in later years. The Treasure of the Angels was described by one
writer: “A host of angels in white garments stand silently row after row
guarding a mysterious treasure with which are bound up the destinies of
the world. It is a blue black stone with an image of the crucifix cut into
it, glowing with emerald hues.” The angels are an early depiction of the
hierarchical Masters that peopled the heart of Roerich's belief in a Great
Brotherhood, watching over and guiding humanity in its eternal journey of
evolution. The “stone” pictured by Roerich is the representation of an
image that recurs in different forms in his paintings and throughout his
writings. The word “treasure” figures prominently in the titles of many of
Roerich's paintings, as, for instance, in The Treasure of the Mountain and
Hidden Treasure. It is clearly not material wealth that he refers to, but
rather the spiritual treasures that lie buried, yet available to those
with the will to unearth them.
Meanwhile Roerich's
search for archeological treasures continued. The Stone Age particularly
intrigued him, and he amassed a large collection of artifacts from that
era. His paintings frequently reflected this interest, as in Three Glaives
in which the subject matter is archeological in nature, and relates to an
ancient legend. Roerich wrote about the unusual similarity of Stone Age
techniques and methods of ornamentation in far-separated regions of the
globe. In comparing these correspondences, he came to instructive
conclusions as to the commonality of human expression and creativity.
The Theatrical Years
In 1906, in the
first of many entrepreneurial efforts that were to bring Russian art and
music to the attention of Europeans, Sergei Diaghilev arranged an
exhibition of Russian paintings in Paris. These included sixteen works by
Nicholas Roerich. The next year, Diaghilev introduced Fyodor Chaliapin to
Paris audiences, along with the music of Mussorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov,
Borodin, Rachmaninov, Scriabin, Glazunov, Stravinsky, and others. In 1909
he presented Chaliapin in Rimsky-Korsakov's Ivan the Terrible, with
costumes and sets designed by Roerich. In the Polovtsian Dances from
Borodin's Prince Igor, also designed by Roerich, and in other ballets,
Diaghilev introduced a corps of Russian dancers that later became famous
as the Ballets Russes, which included Pavlova, Fokine, and Nijinsky.
Roerich's designs furthered his reputation for the telling depiction of
ancient cultures and their practices.
Diaghilev pioneered
an art form that involved the collaboration of the designer as “auteur.”
Thus Alexandre Benois influenced the creation of the ballet Petrouchka,
and Nicholas Roerich was the prime mover and, with Igor Stravinsky, the
co-creator of the ballet Le Sacre du Printemps, or, The Rite of Spring.
At first entitled
The Great Sacrifice: a Tableau of Pagan Russia, the motif for the ballet
grew out of Roerich's absorption with antiquity and, as he wrote in a
letter to Diaghilev, “the beautiful cosmogony of earth and sky.” In the
ballet Roerich sought to express the primitive rites of ancient man as he
welcomed spring, the life-giver, and made sacrifice to Yarilo, the Sun
God. It was a story unlike that of any ballet before it. Stravinsky's
score and Nijinsky's choreography were equally unexpected, and provoked
controversy that was to continue for many years.
At the opening in
Paris on May 29, 1913, one of the audience described the scene: “Nothing
that has ever been written about the battle of Le Sacre du Printemps has
given a faint idea of what actually took place. The theater seemed to be
shaken by an earthquake. It shuddered. People shouted insults, howled and
whistled, drowning out the music. There was slapping and even
punching...the ballet was astoundingly beautiful.”
Interpreting what
could have been described as negative, barbaric behavior, Roerich later
wrote: “I remember how during the first performance the audience whistled
and roared so that nothing could even be heard. Who knows, perhaps at that
very moment they were inwardly exultant and expressing this feeling like
the most primitive of peoples. But I must say, this wild primitivism had
nothing in common with the refined primitiveness of our ancestors, for
whom rhythm, the sacred symbol, and refinement of gesture were great and
sacred concepts.”
Sacre represented
the culmination of Roerich's collaboration with Diaghilev. He recognized
in the impresario a true champion of Russian art, and after Diaghilev's
death in 1929 wrote: “We may regard the...achievement of Diaghilev as that
of a great individual, but it would be still more exact to regard him as
the true representative of an entire movement of synthesis, an eternally
young representative of the great moment when modern art shattered so many
conventions and superficialities.”
The Clouds of War
In the years
immediately preceding World War I, Roerich sensed an impending cataclysm,
and his paintings symbolically depicted the awful scale of the conflict he
felt descending upon the world. These works marked the birth of Roerich
the “prophet.”
In Battle in the
Heavens Roerich used the violent contrast of light and darkness to suggest
the terrible events that would soon overtake Russia and all Europe.
By this time, in his
depiction of both historical and natural themes, symbolism and the use of
allegory had become essential ingredients in his work. As one critic
wrote: “He populated his world not with participants in transitory dramas
and comedies, but with spokesmen for the most steadfast ideas about the
truth of life, the millennial struggle of good and evil, the triumphal
procession of a bright future for all.”
Travel to Other
Shores
In 1915 Roerich
became ill with pneumonia, and was sent by his doctor to recuperate with
his family in Sortavala, Finland. This was a period of great unrest the
world over, and no less so in the lives of the Roerich family. In
Roerich's paintings of the period, such as Karelia -- Eternal Expectation
and The Waiting Woman the cold, austere countryside of rocks and
uninhabited shores of the north seems to express a sense of poignant
longing. In The Waiting Woman, her gaze is fixed on the horizon as if she
awaits some sign of the return of long-gone voyagers.
By 1917 the
revolution was raging in Russia and returning there would have been
dangerous. The family began making plans to visit India, whose magnetic
appeal had been felt increasingly during these years. This became a
possibility in 1918 when Roerich was invited by a Swedish entrepreneur to
exhibit his paintings in Stockholm. From there the family proceeded to
London, where Sir Thomas Beecham had invited Roerich to design a new
production of Prince Igor for the Covent Garden Opera.
America
Meanwhile, an
invitation to come to America was extended by the Chicago Art Institute.
It was accepted, and the tour opened successfully at the Kingore Gallery
in New York in 1920. In addition to exhibiting over 400 paintings there
and in many cities throughout the United States, Roerich designed the
scenery and costumes for productions of The Snow Maiden, and Tristan and
Isolde for the Chicago Opera Company. During his travels in America,
Roerich painted a series in New Mexico, and the Ocean Series in Monhegan,
Maine, where the family spent a summer. He responded to the spirit of
enterprise he found in America and frequently wrote about the positive
influence its developing technology would have on the world. Seeds were
planted and the lives of individuals influenced by Roerich's magnetism and
sense of mission.
In 1921, in New
York, he founded the Master Institute of United Arts, in which he planned
to realize the educational concepts he had incorporated into the
curriculum in St. Petersburg. He attracted a talented group of
instructors. They included Deems Taylor, teaching musical theory and
composition, Robert Edmund Jones and Lee Simonson, teaching theater
design, and top quality instructors in courses that included all musical
instruments, aspects of painting and drawing, design and illustration,
sculpture, architecture, ballet, drama, journalism, and languages -- and
lectures were presented by noted individuals such as George Bellows,
Claude Bragdon, Norman Bel Geddes, and Stark Young.
The Master Institute
flourished, but it did not survive beyond 1937. While the country was in
the grips of the Great Depression and the Roerich family was on expedition
in the Far East, funds ran out and events caused a complete collapse of
the organization that Roerich and his supporters had labored to build.
It was not until
1949 that, under the direction of Sina Fosdick, one of the founding board
members and an Institute faculty member, the institution was reborn as
Nicholas Roerich Museum, in a brownstone on West 107th Street, where it
has remained until the present. Many paintings from the original
collection can now be seen there, and in the intervening years major works
have been added, making it one of the most comprehensive collections of
the artist's work in the world.
During their stay in
America the Roerichs continued to plan for the voyage to India. An
orientation toward Eastern spiritual values is reflected in much of
Roerich's creative work of the time. This is seen in his Ocean Series --
the three paintings, Himself Came, The Bridge of Glory, and Miracle
demonstrate the spiritual power that was beginning to characterize his
work. In The Bridge of Glory, Saint Sergius of Radonezh walks in
contemplation before a blue bridge formed by the aurora borealis,
Roerich's metaphor for the future spiritual bridge that will connect
heaven and earth.
Between 1916 and
1919 Roerich had written a collection of sixty-four blank verse poems that
were published in Berlin, in Russian, under the title Flowers of Morya,
and subsequently published in English as Flame in Chalice. In them we find
Roerich's inner journey charted and his commitment to spiritual search
stated. These poems evoke some of the images that Roerich later used in
his paintings, and in a way help us to understand the symbols and meanings
that lie behind some of them.
In her essay Flowers
of Morya: the Theme of Spiritual Pilgrimage in the Poetry of Nicholas
Roerich, Irina Corten writes: “At the core of Roerich's belief system is
the Hindu concept of a beginningless and endless universe which manifests
itself in recurring cycles of creation and dissolution of material forms
caused by the pulsation of divine energy. On the human plane, this means
the rise and fall of civilizations and, in terms of individual life, the
reincarnation of a soul...” As Roerich, the poet, writes, in the poem
About the Eternal:
Brother, let us
abandon
all that rapidly changes.
Otherwise we will not have time
to turn our thoughts to that
which is changeless for all.
To the eternal.
In May, 1923, the
Roerichs were at last on their way to India, where, in that ageless land,
amid the snows of the Himalayan range, they sought to turn their thoughts
to the Eternal.
India
The Roerichs landed
in Bombay in December, 1923, and began a tour of cultural centers and
historic sites, meeting Indian scientists, scholars, artists, and writers
along the way. By the end of December they were already in Sikkim on the
southern slopes of the Himalayas, and it is clear by the speed with which
they reached the mountains that the Himalayas were where their interest
lay.
They initiated a
journey of exploration that would take them into Chinese Turkestan, Altai,
Mongolia and Tibet. It was an expedition into untracked regions where they
planned to study the religions, languages, customs, and culture of the
inhabitants.
Roerich wrote about
this first Central Asiatic Expedition in his book Heart of Asia, and he
creates for the reader a vivid account of the wonder of the land and its
people. However, the images are nowhere as vivid as in the five hundred or
so paintings that resulted from the trek. In Kanchenjunga, Sikkim Pass,
His Country, The Great Spirit of the Himalayas, and the Banners of the
East series, we can see philosophical concepts and ideas giving birth to
visual images, and the splendor of Northern India providing the physical
setting.
In The Path, the
figure of Christ leads the way along a tortuous path through crags and
peaks of the Himalayas, a metaphor for the hazardous obstacles confronting
the spiritual journeyer. Eastern religious figures and concepts appear in
the paintings, important among these being the images of the Lord Maitreya
-- the Buddhist Messiah, the Kalki-Avatar of the Puranas, Rigden Jyepo of
Mongolia, or the White Burkhan of Altai -- all of whom are described in
legends that link them with the Ruler of Shambhala, who is “destined to
appear on earth for the final destruction of the wicked, the renovation of
creation and the restoration of purity.”(quoted from The Theosophical
Glossary, by H. P. Blavatsky)
The trek was at
times arduous. Roerich tells us that thirty-five mountain passes from
fourteen to twenty-one thousand feet in elevation were crossed. But these
were the challenges he felt born for, believing that the rigor of the
mountains helped a man to find courage and develop strength of spirit. And
in spite of obstacles, wherever they went the Roerichs' belief in the
essential goodness of life and the spirituality of man was reinforced.
Roerich's Banners of the East series of nineteen paintings depicting the
world's religious teachers, Mohammed, Jesus, Moses, Confucius, and Buddha,
and the Indian and Christian saints and sages, was a testimonial to the
unity of religious striving and the common roots of man's faith.
At counterpoint to
these themes in Roerich's painting is the image of Woman and her destined
role in the coming era, and we can assume that what Helena Roerich wrote
to a friend in 1937 reflects Nicholas' own point of view: “...woman should
realize that she herself contains all forces, and the moment she shakes
off the age-old hypnosis of her seemingly lawful subjugation and mental
inferiority and occupies herself with a manifold education, she will
create in collaboration with man a new and better world... Cosmos affirms
the greatness of woman's creative principle. Woman is a personification of
nature, and it is nature that teaches man, not man nature. Therefore, may
all women realize the grandeur of their origin, and may they strive for
knowledge.” (published in Letters of Helena Roerich 1935-1939, vol. II)
Nicholas Roerich
depicted the great female deities in such paintings as She Who Leads,
Madonna Laboris, and The Mother of the World. This latter conception,
equivalent to the Lakshmi and Kali of India, is one of Roerich's most
inspiring images, rendered with majesty in deep tones of blue and violet.
Helena Roerich's contribution in the life and work of Nicholas cannot be
overestimated. Their union could be best described as a lifetime
collaboration in fields of mutual endeavor. Her philosophy, comprising a
living ethic, was shared by Nicholas and motivated him in his work and his
life. At some time in their late years an anniversary approached and he
wrote in his diary: “Forty years -- no less than forty. On such a long
voyage, meeting many storms and dangers from without, together we overcame
all obstacles. And obstacles turned into possibilities. I dedicated my
books to Helena, my wife, friend, traveling companion, inspirer! Each of
these concepts was tested in the fire of life. And in Petersburg,
Scandinavia, England, America, and in all Asia we worked, we studied, we
broadened our consciousness. Together we created, and not without reason
is it said that the work should bear two names -- a feminine and a
masculine.”
At the end of their
major expedition, in 1928, the family settled in the Kullu Valley at an
elevation of 6,500 feet in the Himalayan foothills, with a magnificent
view of the valley and the surrounding mountains. Here they established
their home and the headquarters of the Urusvati Himalayan Research
Institute, which was organized to study the results of their expedition,
and of those explorations that were yet to come. The Institute's
activities included botanical and ethnological-linguistic studies, and the
exploration of archeological sites. Under the direction of their father
the two Roerich sons, George and Svetoslav, established a collection of
medicinal herbs, and made extensive studies in botany and ancient medical
lore, as well as in Tibetan and Chinese pharmacopoeia.
In the following
year, on a trip back to New York for the opening of the Roerich Museum's
new premises, Roerich raised an issue that had been close to his heart for
many years. Using the Red Cross as an example, he proposed a treaty for
the protection of cultural treasures during times of both war and peace --
a proposal he had unsuccessfully tried to promote in 1914. In consultation
with lawyers versed in international law, he drafted a Pact, and suggested
that a flag would be flown over all places under its protection. This flag
he called the Banner of Peace. The design of the Banner shows three
spheres surrounded by a circle, in magenta color on a white background. Of
the many national and individual interpretations of this symbol, the most
usual are perhaps those of Religion, Art and Science as aspects of
Culture, which is the surrounding circle; or of past, present, and future
achievements of humanity guarded within the circle of Eternity. The symbol
can be seen in the seal of Tamerlane, in Tibetan, Caucasian, and
Scandinavian jewelry, and on Byzantine and Roman artifacts. The image of
the Strasbourg Madonna is adorned with it. It can be seen in many of
Roerich's paintings, most notably Madonna Oriflamma, in which Woman is
depicted as the carrier and defender of the Banner. In this sign and the
motto, Pax Cultura, that accompanies it, is symbolized Roerich's vision
for humanity. As he wrote: “Let us be united -- you will ask in what way?
You will agree with me: in the easiest way, to create a common and sincere
language. Perhaps in Beauty and Knowledge.” Roerich's efforts to
promulgate such a treaty resulted, finally, on April 15, 1935, in the
signing by the nations of the Americas -- members of the Pan American
Union -- of The Roerich Pact, in the White House in Washington. This is a
treaty still in force. Many individuals, groups, and associations around
the world continue to promote awareness of the Pact, the Banner, and their
underlying principles.
It is in his
Himalayan paintings that one most easily finds evidence of the loftiness
of spirit and sense of mission that led Roerich to attempt the tasks he
set for himself. In them can be seen the sense of drama, the urgency of a
message to send or receive, a traveler to greet, a mission to perform, a
path to travel. The towering mountains stand for the spiritual goals that
humanity must set for itself. Roerich urges people on to their spiritual
destiny and reminds them of their duty to prepare for the New Era in which
Rigden Jyepo will gather his army and under the Banner of Light defeat the
host of darkness. Roerich the warrior was already armed and mounted; he
sought to muster his army for the battle, and bid that their breastplates
bear the word “culture.”
The pursuit of
refinement and beauty was sacred for Roerich. He believed that although
earthly temples and artifacts may perish, the thought that brings them
into existence does not die but is part of an eternal stream of
consciousness -- man's aspirations nourished by his directed will and by
the energy of thought. Finally, he believed that peace on Earth was a
prerequisite to planetary survival and the continuing process of spiritual
evolution, and he exhorted his fellow man to help achieve that peace by
uniting in the common language of Beauty and Knowledge.
Nicholas Roerich
died in Kullu on December 13, 1947. His body was cremated and its ashes
buried on a slope facing the mountains he loved and portrayed in many of
his nearly seven thousand works.
Return to
Table of Contents
|