|
PAINFUL DECEPTIONS -- ILLUSTRATED SCREENPLAY & SCREENCAP GALLERY |
|
Also, they say it is a piece of the "aircraft," that hit the building, not a piece of Flight 77.
Was this just a meaningless choice of words, or are military officials deliberately refusing to put their name on documents that clearly state that they found pieces of Flight 77? Could it be that military officials deliberately make vague statements so that they can fake innocence at a trial? The particular words in this caption make it easy to fake innocence. If the person who wrote that caption was taken to court, he could say, "I never said those scraps were from Flight 77, I said it was believed to be from whatever aircraft hit the Pentagon."
A more significant example is that military officials claim they have no idea who released these five images from the Pentagon security camera.
Is our military really this incompetent or is everybody afraid to have their name associated with those images? Consider what would happen if this scam were exposed and a trial were conducted? Everybody who saw that security video saw something similar to a global hawk and a missile. They did not see Flight 77; therefore, everybody who saw that video could be accused of being an accessory to this scam since they helped to deceive the world about it. This would explain why nobody in the military is willing to admit to having seen that video. If there is ever a trial for this scam, everybody in the military will pretend they never had access to this video.
|
