|
CHAPTER 4. ON THE PRESENT ABILITY OF
AMERICA, WITH SOME MISCELLANEOUS REFLECTIONS
I have never met with a man,
either in England or America, who hath not confessed his opinion, that a
separation between the countries, would take place one time or other. And
there is no instance in which we have shown less judgment, than in
endeavoring to describe, what we call, the ripeness or fitness of the
Continent for independence.
As all men allow the measure, and
vary only in their opinion of the time, let us, in order to remove
mistakes, take a general survey of things and endeavor if possible, to
find out the very time. But we need not go far, the inquiry ceases at
once, for the time hath found us. The general concurrence, the glorious
union of all things prove the fact.
It is not in numbers but in
unity, that our great strength lies; yet our present numbers are
sufficient to repel the force of all the world. The Continent hath, at
this time, the largest body of armed and disciplined men of any power
under Heaven; and is just arrived at that pitch of strength, in which no
single colony is able to support itself, and the whole, who united can
accomplish the matter, and either more, or, less than this, might be fatal
in its effects. Our land force is already sufficient, and as to naval
affairs, we cannot be insensible, that Britain would never suffer an
American man of war to be built while the continent remained in her hands.
Wherefore we should be no forwarder an hundred years hence in that branch,
than we are now; but the truth is, we should be less so, because the
timber of the country is every day diminishing, and that which will remain
at last, will be far off and difficult to procure.
Were the continent crowded with
inhabitants, her sufferings under the present circumstances would be
intolerable. The more sea port towns we had, the more should we have both
to defend and to loose. Our present numbers are so happily proportioned to
our wants, that no man need be idle. The diminution of trade affords an
army, and the necessities of an army create a new trade. Debts we have
none; and whatever we may contract on this account will serve as a
glorious memento of our virtue. Can we but leave posterity with a settled
form of government, an independent constitution of its own, the purchase
at any price will be cheap. But to expend millions for the sake of getting
a few we acts repealed, and routing the present ministry only, is unworthy
the charge, and is using posterity with the utmost cruelty; because it is
leaving them the great work to do, and a debt upon their backs, from which
they derive no advantage. Such a thought is unworthy a man of honor, and
is the true characteristic of a narrow heart and a peddling politician.
The debt we may contract doth not
deserve our regard if the work be but accomplished. No nation ought to be
without a debt. A national debt is a national bond; and when it bears no
interest, is in no case a grievance. Britain is oppressed with a debt of
upwards of one hundred and forty millions sterling, for which she pays
upwards of four millions interest. And as a compensation for her debt, she
has a large navy; America is without a debt, and without a navy; yet for
the twentieth part of the English national debt, could have a navy as
large again. The navy of England is not worth, at this time, more than
three millions and a half sterling.
The following calculations are
given as a proof that the above estimation of the navy is a just one.
[See Entick's naval history, Intro. p. 56.]
The charge of building a ship of
each rate, and furnishing her with masts, yards, sails and rigging,
together with a proportion of eight months boatswain's and carpenter's
sea-stores, as calculated by Mr. Burchett, Secretary to the navy.
| For a ship of 100 guns |
L35,553 |
| 90 |
29,886 |
| 80 |
23,638 |
| 70 |
17,785 |
| 60 |
14,197 |
| 50 |
10,606 |
| 40 |
7,558 |
| 30 |
5,846 |
| 20 |
3,710 |
And hence it is easy to sum
up the value, or cost, rather, of the whole British navy, which, in the year
1757, when it was as its greatest glory, consisted of the following ships
and guns:
| Ships |
Guns |
Cost of one |
Cost of
all |
| 6 |
100 |
55,553 L |
213,318 L |
| 12 |
90 |
29,886 |
358,632
|
| 12 |
80 |
23,638 |
283,656
|
| 43 |
70 |
17,785
|
746,755
|
| 35 |
60 |
14,197 |
496,895
|
| 40 |
50 |
10,606 |
424,240
|
| 45 |
40 |
7,758 |
344,110
|
| 58 |
20 |
3,710 |
215,180
|
| 85 Sloops, bombs, and
and fireships, one with another, at |
|
2,000 |
170,000
|
| Cost
|
3,266,786 L |
|
Remains for guns |
233,214
|
| Total |
3,500,000 L |
No country on the globe is so
happily situated, so internally capable of raising a fleet as America.
Tar, timber, iron, and cordage are her natural produce. We need go abroad
for nothing. Whereas the Dutch, who make large profits by hiring out their
ships of war to the Spaniards and Portuguese, are obliged to import most
of the materials they use. We ought to view the building a fleet as an
article of commerce, it being the natural manufactory of this country. It
is the best money we can lay out. A navy when finished is worth more than
it cost. And is that nice point in national policy, in which commerce and
protection are united. Let us build; if we want them not, we can sell; and
by that means replace our paper currency with ready gold and silver.
In point of manning a fleet,
people in general run into great errors; it is not necessary that
one-fourth part should be sailors. The privateer Terrible, Captain Death,
stood the hottest engagement of any ship last war, yet had not twenty
sailors on board, though her complement of men was upwards of two hundred.
A few able and social sailors will soon instruct a sufficient number of
active landsmen in the common work of a ship. Wherefore, we never can be
more capable to begin on maritime matters than now, while our timber is
standing, our fisheries blocked up, and our sailors and shipwrights out of
employ. Men of war of seventy and eighty guns were built forty years ago
in New England, and why not the same now? Ship building is America's
greatest pride, and in which, she will in time excel the whole world. The
great empires of the east are mostly inland, and consequently excluded
from the possibility of rivalling her. Africa is in a state of barbarism;
and no power in Europe, hath either such an extent or coast, or such an
internal supply of materials. Where nature hath given the one, she has
withheld the other; to America only hath she been liberal of both. The
vast empire of Russia is almost shut out from the sea; wherefore, her
boundless forests, her tar, iron, and cordage are only articles of
commerce.
In point of safety, ought we to
be without a fleet? We are not the little people now, which we were sixty
years ago; at that time we might have trusted our property in the streets,
or fields rather; and slept securely without locks or bolts to our doors
or windows. The case now is altered, and our methods of defence ought to
improve with our increase of property. A common pirate, twelve months ago,
might have come up the Delaware, and laid the city of Philadelphia under
instant contribution, for what sum he pleased; and the same might have
happened to other places. Nay, any daring fellow, in a brig of fourteen or
sixteen guns, might have robbed the whole Continent, and carried off half
a million of money. These are circumstances which demand our attention,
and point out the necessity of naval protection.
Some, perhaps, will say, that
after we have made it up with Britain, she will protect us. Can we be so
unwise as to mean, that she shall keep a navy in our harbors for that
purpose? Common sense will tell us, that the power which hath endeavored
to subdue us, is of all others the most improper to defend us. Conquest
may be effected under the pretence of friendship; and ourselves, after a
long and brave resistance, be at last cheated into slavery. And if her
ships are not to be admitted into our harbors, I would ask, how is she to
protect us? A navy three or four thousand miles off can be of little use,
and on sudden emergencies, none at all. Wherefore, if we must hereafter
protect ourselves, why not do it for ourselves? Why do it for another?
The English list of ships of war
is long and formidable, but not a tenth part of them are at any one time
fit for service, numbers of them not in being; yet their names are
pompously continued in the list, if only a plank be left of the ship: and
not a fifth part, of such as are fit for service, can be spared on any one
station at one time. The East, and West Indies, Mediterranean, Africa, and
other parts over which Britain extends her claim, make large demands upon
her navy. From a mixture of prejudice and inattention, we have contracted
a false notion respecting the navy of England, and have talked as if we
should have the whole of it to encounter at once, and for that reason,
supposed that we must have one as large; which not being instantly
practicable, have been made use of by a set of disguised tories to
discourage our beginning thereon. Nothing can be farther from truth than
this; for if America had only a twentieth part of the naval force of
Britain, she would be by far an over match for her; because, as we neither
have, nor claim any foreign dominion, our whole force would be employed on
our own coast, where we should, in the long run, have two to one the
advantage of those who had three or four thousand miles to sail over,
before they could attack us, and the same distance to return in order to
refit and recruit. And although Britain by her fleet, hath a check over
our trade to Europe, we have as large a one over her trade to the West
Indies, which, by laying in the neighborhood of the Continent, is entirely
at its mercy.
Some method might be fallen on to
keep up a naval force in time of peace, if we should not judge it
necessary to support a constant navy. If premiums were to be given to
merchants, to build and employ in their service, ships mounted with
twenty, thirty, forty, or fifty guns, (the premiums to be in proportion to
the loss of bulk to the merchants) fifty or sixty of those ships, with a
few guard ships on constant duty, would keep up a sufficient navy, and
that without burdening ourselves with the evil so loudly complained of in
England, of suffering their fleet, in time of peace to lie rotting in the
docks. To unite the sinews of commerce and defence is sound policy; for
when our strength and our riches, play into each other's hand, we need
fear no external enemy.
In almost every article of
defence we abound. Hemp flourishes even to rankness, so that we need not
want cordage. Our iron is superior to that of other countries. Our small
arms equal to any in the world. Cannon we can cast at pleasure. Saltpetre
and gunpowder we are every day producing. Our knowledge is hourly
improving. Resolution is our inherent character, and courage hath never
yet forsaken us. Wherefore, what is it that we want? Why is it that we
hesitate? From Britain we can expect nothing but ruin. If she is once
admitted to the government of America again, this Continent will not be
worth living in. Jealousies will be always arising; insurrections will be
constantly happening; and who will go forth to quell them? Who will
venture his life to reduce his own countrymen to a foreign obedience? The
difference between Pennsylvania and Connecticut, respecting some unlocated
lands, shows the insignificance of a British government, and fully proves,
that nothing but Continental authority can regulate Continental matters.
Another reason why the present
time is preferable to all others, is, that the fewer our numbers are, the
more land there is yet unoccupied, which instead of being lavished by the
king on his worthless dependents, may be hereafter applied, not only to
the discharge of the present debt, but to the constant support of
government. No nation under heaven hath such an advantage as this.
The infant state of the Colonies,
as it is called, so far from being against, is an argument in favor of
independence. We are sufficiently numerous, and were we more so, we might
be less united. It is a matter worthy of observation, that the more a
country is peopled, the smaller their armies are. In military numbers, the
ancients far exceeded the moderns: and the reason is evident, for trade
being the consequence of population, men become too much absorbed thereby
to attend to anything else. Commerce diminishes the spirit, both of
patriotism and military defence. And history sufficiently informs us, that
the bravest achievements were always accomplished in the non-age of a
nation. With the increase of commerce England hath lost its spirit. The
city of London, notwithstanding its numbers, submits to continued insults
with the patience of a coward. The more men have to lose, the less willing
are they to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear, and submit to
courtly power with the trembling duplicity of a spaniel.
Youth is the seed-time of good
habits, as well in nations as in individuals. It might be difficult, if
not impossible, to form the Continent into one government half a century
hence. The vast variety of interests, occasioned by an increase of trade
and population, would create confusion. Colony would be against colony.
Each being able might scorn each other's assistance: and while the proud
and foolish gloried in their little distinctions, the wise would lament
that the union had not been formed before. Wherefore, the present time is
the true time for establishing it. The intimacy which is contracted in
infancy, and the friendship which is formed in misfortune, are, of all
others, the most lasting and unalterable. Our present union is marked with
both these characters: we are young, and we have been distressed; but our
concord hath withstood our troubles, and fixes a memorable area for
posterity to glory in.
The present time, likewise, is
that peculiar time, which never happens to a nation but once, viz., the
time of forming itself into a government. Most nations have let slip the
opportunity, and by that means have been compelled to receive laws from
their conquerors, instead of making laws for themselves. First, they had a
king, and then a form of government; whereas, the articles or charter of
government, should be formed first, and men delegated to execute them
afterwards: but from the errors of other nations, let us learn wisdom, and
lay hold of the present opportunity- to begin government at the right end.
When William the Conqueror
subdued England he gave them law at the point of the sword; and until we
consent that the seat of government in America, be legally and
authoritatively occupied, we shall be in danger of having it filled by
some fortunate ruffian, who may treat us in the same manner, and then,
where will be our freedom? where our property?
As to religion, I hold it to be
the indispensable duty of all government, to protect all conscientious
professors thereof, and I know of no other business which government hath
to do therewith. Let a man throw aside that narrowness of soul, that
selfishness of principle, which the niggards of all professions are so
unwilling to part with, and he will be at once delivered of his fears on
that head. Suspicion is the companion of mean souls, and the bane of all
good society. For myself I fully and conscientiously believe, that it is
the will of the Almighty, that there should be diversity of religious
opinions among us: It affords a larger field for our Christian kindness.
Were we all of one way of thinking, our religious dispositions would want
matter for probation; and on this liberal principle, I look on the various
denominations among us, to be like children of the same family, differing
only, in what is called their Christian names.
In a former page, I threw out
a few thoughts on the propriety of a Continental Charter, (for I only
presume to offer hints, not plans) and in this place, I take the liberty
of re-mentioning the subject, by observing, that a charter is to be
understood as a bond of solemn obligation, which the whole enters into, to
support the right of every separate part, whether of religion, personal
freedom, or property. A firm bargain and a right reckoning make long
friends.
I have heretofore likewise
mentioned the necessity of a large and equal representation; and there is
no political matter which more deserves our attention. A small number of
electors, or a small number of representatives, are equally dangerous. But
if the number of the representatives be not only small, but unequal, the
danger is increased. As an instance of this, I mention the following; when
the Associators petition was before the House of Assembly of Pennsylvania;
twenty-eight members only were present, all the Bucks County members,
being eight, voted against it, and had seven of the Chester members done
the same, this whole province had been governed by two counties only, and
this danger it is always exposed to. The unwarrantable stretch likewise,
which that house made in their last sitting, to gain an undue authority
over the delegates of that province, ought to warn the people at large,
how they trust power out of their own hands. A set of instructions for the
Delegates were put together, which in point of sense and business would
have dishonored a school-boy, and after being approved by a few, a very
few without doors, were carried into the house, and there passed in behalf
of the whole colony; whereas, did the whole colony know, with what
ill-will that House hath entered on some necessary public measures, they
would not hesitate a moment to think them unworthy of such a trust.
Immediate necessity makes many
things convenient, which if continued would grow into oppressions.
Expedience and right are different things. When the calamities of America
required a consultation, there was no method so ready, or at that time so
proper, as to appoint persons from the several Houses of Assembly for that
purpose and the wisdom with which they have proceeded hath preserved this
continent from ruin. But as it is more than probable that we shall never
be without a Congress, every well-wisher to good order, must own, that the
mode for choosing members of that body, deserves consideration. And I put
it as a question to those, who make a study of mankind, whether
representation and election is not too great a power for one and the same
body of men to possess? When we are planning for posterity, we ought to
remember that virtue is not hereditary.
It is from our enemies that we
often gain excellent maxims, and are frequently surprised into reason by
their mistakes. Mr. Cornwall (one of the Lords of the Treasury) treated
the petition of the New York Assembly with contempt, because that House,
he said, consisted but of twenty-six members, which trifling number, he
argued, could not with decency be put for the whole. We thank him for his
involuntary honesty. [1]
To conclude. However strange it
may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters
not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given, to show, that
nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined
declaration for independence. Some of which are,
1st, It is the custom of
nations, when any two are at war, for some other powers, not engaged in
the quarrel, to step in as mediators, and bring about the preliminaries of
a peace: but while America calls herself the subject of Great Britain, no
power, however well disposed she may be, can offer her mediation.
Wherefore, in our present state we may quarrel on for ever.
2nd, It is unreasonable to
suppose, that France or Spain will give us any kind of assistance, if we
mean only to make use of that assistance for the purpose of repairing the
breach, and strengthening the connection between Britain and America;
because, those powers would be sufferers by the consequences.
3d, While we profess
ourselves the subjects of Britain, we must, in the eye of foreign nations,
be considered as rebels. The precedent is somewhat dangerous to their
peace, for men to be in arms under the name of subjects; we on the spot,
can solve the paradox: but to unite resistance and subjection, requires an
idea much too refined for common understanding.
4th, Should a manifesto to be
published, and despatched to foreign courts, setting forth the miseries we
have endured, and the peaceable methods we have ineffectually used for
redress; declaring, at the same time, that not being able, any longer to
live happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the British court,
we had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connection with
her; at the same time assuring all such courts of our peaceable
disposition towards them, and of our desire of entering into trade with
them. Such a memorial would produce more good effects to this Continent,
than if a ship were freighted with petitions to Britain.
Under our present denomination of
British subjects we can neither be received nor heard abroad: The custom
of all courts is against us, and will be so, until, by an independence, we
take rank with other nations.
These proceedings may at first
appear strange and difficult; but, like all other steps which we have
already passed over, will in a little time become familiar and agreeable;
and, until an independence is declared, the continent will feel itself
like a man who continues putting off some unpleasant business from day to
day, yet knows it must be done, hates to set about it, wishes it over, and
is continually haunted with the thoughts of its necessity.
______________
1. Those who would fully understand
of what great consequence a large and equal representation is to a state,
should read Burgh's political Disquisitions.
Go to Next Page
|