|
EMAIL FROM CHARLES CARREON TO HILARY WARE, GOOGLE, INC. DATED AUGUST 29, 2007 |
|
Google Watch, by google-watch.org
From: "Charles Carreon" <chas@charlescarreon.com> Add to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Dear Hilary and Adam: Thank you very much for your attentive consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
Buddha was born in Northern India in 563 B.C.
<html>
<head>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<title>What is Buddhism, by Charles and Tara Carreon,
American Buddha Online
Library</title>
</head>
<!-- BEGIN AMBU_S1 --><div align="right"><span
style="font-size: 12px; border: solid 1px #000000; align: right;
padding: 2px; background: #FAFAFA; color: #000000">
<a style="color: #330000;" href="?logout">Log
out</a>.</span></div>
<!-- END AMBU_S1 --><body bgcolor="#333399"
text="#00CCFF" link="#FFCCFF" vlink="#FFCCFF" alink="#FFCCFF"><!-- BEGIN
AMBU_BOT_NAV --><style>
<!--
body, font, table, tr, td, span, div {
font-family: "Times New Roman";
}
-->
</style>
<center>
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/index.htm">Home</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/index.old.1.htm">Home
B</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/viva.htm">Viva!</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/site.map.htm">Site
Map</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/site.1.map.htm">Site
Map B</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/bulletin_board/">Bulletin
Board</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/solarpoweredadventures.htm">SPA</a>]
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/childoffortuneindex.htm">Child
of Fortune</a>]
<span id="bx11" name="bx11"> [<a href="javascript:doSearch1();">Search</a>]</span>
[<a href="http://www.american-buddha.com/search.php">Amazon</a>]
<script language="javascript">
function doSearch1() {
document.getElementById("bx11").style.display
= "none";
document.getElementById("bx12").style.display
= "inline";
}
</script>
<span id="bx12" name="bx12" style="display:none">
<div id="ysrchForm" style="border:1px solid
#7E9DB9;
background:#FFFFFF;
width:300px;
margin:0 auto;
padding:20px;
position:relative;
">
<form id="searchBoxForm_U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY"
action="http://builder.search.yahoo.com/a/bouncer" style="padding:0;">
<input name="mobid"
value="U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY" type="hidden">
<input name="ei" value="UTF-8"
type="hidden"><input name="fr" value="ystg-c" type="hidden"><div
style="padding:0 80px 0 0;zoom:1;">
<input type="text" id="searchTerm"
onFocus="this.style.background='#fff';"
onBlur="if(this.value=='')this.style.background='#fff
url(http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sch/gr/horiz_pwrlogo_red2.gif)
3px center no-repeat'"
name="p" style="
margin:1px 0; width:100%; border:1px solid #7E9DB9; color:#666666;
height:18px; padding:0px 3px; background:#fff url(http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sch/gr/horiz_pwrlogo_red2.gif)
3px center no-repeat; position:relative;">
<input type="submit"
id="btn_U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY" value="Search"
style="
padding-bottom:2px; position:absolute; right:20px; top:20px; margin:0px;
height:22px; width:65px; ">
</div><ul style="color:#666666;
font:11px/11px normal Arial, Helvetica,
sans-serif;
margin:0;
padding:0;
text-align:left;
list-style-type:none;"><li
style="display:inline;padding-right:10px;">
<input name="mobvs" id="site_U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY"
value="1" onclick='displayPopSearch("site","U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY");'
type="hidden">
<label for="site_U0RezytM6@OUoAAGBU0QY" style="display:inline;vertical-align:middle;
padding-top:2px;">this Site</label>
</li></ul></form></div>
</span>
</center>
<div align="center">
<center>
<table border="0" width="80%">
<tr>
<td align="center"><b>
<font face="Times New Roman" color="#ff0000"
size="2">
</a></font></b><p>
<b><font size="6" face="Times New Roman">WHAT IS
BUDDHISM?</font></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New
Roman">by Charles and Tara Carreon</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman"><a
href="awhatisbudnewbuddha6.jpg">
<img border="0" src="awhatisbudnewbuddha6_small.jpg"
xthumbnail-orig-image="awhatisbudnewbuddha6.jpg" width="232"
height="300"></a></font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
Bugs Out</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
was born in Northern India
in 563 B.C. His father was a small-time
monarch of the Sakya clan, with
big aspirations for his son to become a "universal
monarch." An itinerant
fortuneteller told the Buddha's father that while
the government career
path was a possibility for his son, he might also
become a saint.
Horrified by the latter notion, his father came up
with the idea to
marinate his son in every pleasure, and insulate
him from every
irritation, so that he would have no desire to
escape worldly life;
Buddha's father thus entombed the young prince in a
pleasure warren.
Legend has it that Buddha sneaked out in the palace
limo and took a cruise
around town, where he saw a decrepit senior citizen
wheezing his last, a
leper counting his missing fingers, a corpse with
weeping mourners, and a
monk who was the picture of serenity. Buddha
apparently felt betrayed,
like he'd been eating a yummy apple and discovered
it was infested with
disgusting worms. He considered his options
-- and decided to go the
monastic route. He cut off his long,
beautiful hair that his mother loved
so much, and left the palace like a thief in the
night, hooking up with
some rough trade at the outskirts of town that
called themselves "yogis."</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
Rejects Spiritual
Authority</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">In
his quest for "enlightenment,"
Buddha studied the
teachings of the the leading gurus, pandits and yogis
then swarming the
Indian jungles. While seeking
enlightenment was a
popular pastime, apparently Buddha found no
successful practitioners,
because he concluded none of the available teachers
had found the goal.
In this sense, Buddha might be considered the
pickiest of spiritual
shoppers, and indeed, an incredibly arrogant
man. After all, this was
India at the height of its spiritual
development. The term "Rishi," had
existed long before Buddha -- and monks,
renunciates, fakirs, shiva and
vaishnava babas were thick as flies in the holy
centers, as they are
today. Buddha jumped the fence, an impatient
upstart who was probably
secretly sneered at for being "the
Prince," because of his royal
upbringing. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Apparently
running full-tilt for
the psychological
opposite of being a spoiled royal scion, Buddha became a
severe ascetic .
Stone carvings of the Buddha in his sixth year of
renunciation show him in the advanced stages of
anorexia nervosa, a
diagnosis common in the children of overbearing,
wealthy parents.
Fortunately, he found the path to recovery.
Buddha is said to have
"renounced the ascetic path" after he
realized the futility of starving
the body to conquer the spirit.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
Gets It</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Of
course, renouncing the ascetic
path didn't mean
he walked into town, had a drink at the tavern and
checked out the
chicks, like most Buddhists who are renouncing
asceticism.
Instead, he took "the Middle Way," and after having a good
meal of rice pudding, sat down on a comfy cushion
of grass under a ficus
tree, and resolved to stay there until he achieved
his goal. Frankly,
this still sounds pretty austere to me, especially
the part about staying
there until he "achieved his goal."
He hadn't done it in six years before
then, and what was the magic of resolving to stay
in one place? One might
question how much he had really renounced
asceticism, with this kind of
resolve as his new point of departure, but
fortunately, he attained
enlightenment less than twenty four hours later, as
he glimpsed the light
of the morning star after a single night battling
the demons of his own
mind. If he hadn't succeeded that
night, of course, he wouldn't be
"Buddha" now, would he?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
demons of Buddha's own mind
are personified as
Mara in tradition. Mara assailed the
budding Buddha
first with hostile arrows of aggression that turned
to flowers as they
descended on the meditating sage. Frustrated,
Mara loosed his beautiful
daughters to work their charms upon Buddha, but
again to no avail. Thus
Buddha transcended hatred and desire. The
Tibetans will also explain in
detail how he transcended ignorance, pride and
jealousy as well, resorting
to tripartite and five-branched analyses, according
to their various
traditions. Suffice it to say, it was a big
night for Buddha, and for all
humanity when he sent Mara packing forever.
Hallelujah!</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Two
thoughts occurred to Buddha
after he attained
enlightenment. "Wow, this is
Great!" and "Nobody else
will get it, or even believe it, so I won't tell
anyone." We can
understand both of these thoughts without being
enlightened. Of course,
getting enlightened has gotta be Great, otherwise
it wouldn't be called
getting enlightened. Next, India's swarming
with sages who claim to offer
paths to enlightenment -- there's gods everywhere
decorating banyan trees
and temples, but here, a mere six years after
running away from his
throne, this Sakya Prince is enlightened. You
can imagine a lot of hash
smoke being coughed out over that one!
So naturally, he must have second
thoughts about making his proclamation.
According to legend, he was just
going to keep mum about the whole thing and let his
secret go to the grave
with him, like some old pirate with a stash of
treasure. According also
to legend, the gods gave him a nudge, too, pointing
out that<i> </i>they
were interested in what he had to say, and actually
there were a few
bright people who might get it.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
Converts The Doubters</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
first people Buddha met were
his old pals, some
fellow-anorexics who were still nursing their brittle
bones and grasping
at straws in the twilight of their meditative
ignorance.
They dumped all over Buddha, who by now was eating regular
meals and looking chubby by ascetic standards.
But he ripped right into
them with his incisive analysis of their folly, and
pretty soon he had
picked up several new converts. They cut
their hair and started eating
and following the Buddha. They all remained
celibate, though, and agreed
to remain unemployed, making their living begging.
Buddha called this The
Middle Path. Makes sense, right? Not a
breeder, not contributing to the
economy, but not an ascetic. Just a guy who's
free to be.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman"
size="4">Buddha's Disciples Fail to
Take Notes</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
Buddha's disciples apparently
never begged any
pencil and paper from anyone, even though writing was
actively practiced
at the time in scholarly circles, and many of the early
monks were
scholarly. You might almost think
someone had told them not to
write anything down, because it took 300 years for
them to even take a
crack at it. Sort of a confidentiality
agreement. Well, you can imagine
after 300 years, memories varied considerably,
depending on what part of
the jungle you had been camped out in for the
intervening centuries.
Naturally, the Buddhists fell to disputing and
haven't stopped since.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">As A
Result, They Fight</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
first big Buddhist dispute,
and the main one
today, is between the tight-assed people and the
big-hearted
people. The tight-assed people are
called "Hinayanists" by
the big-hearted people, who call themselves "Mahayanists."
The
Mahayanists are called "heretics" by the
serious Hinayanists. Now that
they are all here together in the USA, they try to
paper over these
disputes, but the enmity is mutual and long-running
among true partisans
of either disposition.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">What
They Fight About</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">What
is all the row about,
though?
Just this -- the Official Tight Assed Buddhists (Hinayanists)
think that the Buddha really meant it when he said
that in order to attain
Nirvana you need to extinguish desire, and they go
around trying to stamp
it out wherever they find it. They shave
their heads, bind their breasts,
sit long hours trying to not want to stand up and
move around, because
after all, that's wanting something, which is the
whole problem. They
sort of try to strangle themselves to escape the
pain of living, which is
after all caused by breathing. Occasionally
they attain mental states of
great satisfaction similar to sheathing your entire
body in a condom so
you won't get contaminated by desire or other
disturbing experiences. A
Hinayanist is sure that everything will be all
right if he can just stop
being anyone at all. This is an excellent
religion for trust funders on a
budget, because you won't spend much on
entertainment, or fall in love and
blow all your cash raising a family.
Actually, this sounds a lot like the
religion the Buddha really would have founded,
given his proclivities.
Which may explain why the Hinayanists are so damned
mad at the Mahayanists
for hijacking their tidy little
religion.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
big-hearted Mahayanists are
all over the map
with their doctrines, by comparison.
But they all agree
that the sort of cat-washing-itself style of
meditation practiced by
Hinayanists leads only to the minor spiritual
achievement of "Arhat-ship,"
which is a classic of damning with faint praise.
The real heavy
freight-carriers in the big-hearted tradition are
called Bodhisattvas,
"heroes of enlightenment," and far from
stopping to consider their own
immediate release from suffering, they throw
themselves immediately into
the business of placing other sentient beings in
the bosom of
enlightenment, like firemen clearing out a burning
building. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">In
practice, this leaves the
Mahayana much
greater scope for imaginative expression, and opens the door
to a less prissy
ethical approach. A Jew would always
have to wonder if
he was safe hiding from nazis in a Hinayanist's
basement, who might feel
compelled to tell the truth to keep his karma
clean, but would feel
comfortable hiding in a Mahayana basement, knowing
that a Mahayanist would
relish the opportunity to tell a meritorious
lie. On the other hand, a
Mahayanist might also find an excellent reason to
screw your wife, for
everyone's benefit. It's like
that.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
most-often cited sources of
Hinayana Buddhism
are The Dhammapada and the Sutta-Pitaka.
The practices
of these Buddhists are often marketed in the U.S.
as "vipassana" or
"mindfulness" meditation, supplemented
with the practice of "mehta," the
cultivation of positive feeling toward all
beings. These practices
emphasize, at least at the beginning stages,
reducing the traffic of
conceptual thought by resting the mind on simple
sensory stimuli, such as
the feeling of your ass sitting on your cushion, or
your diaphragm rising
and falling with each breath. They really
work. These practices have
innumberable adherents, and are often presented
with less packaging than
Mahayana schools. There are probably lots of
big-hearted Buddhists
practicing under cover of the Hinayana method,
ignoring their purported
dispute with the Mahayana. On the other hand,
the heartlands of Hinayana
Buddhism are repressive regimes like Burma, and Sri
Lanka. Thai Buddhists
are also allegedly Hinayanist, but their food seems
very big-hearted.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
resounding sources of
Mahayana Buddhism
are the early Chinese Ch'an Buddhist texts like The
Sutra of Hui Neng
and the Diamond Sutra, and the Third Zen Patriarch's
Sutra on Faith in
the Mind. These sutras are easy to understand once you
stop trying too
hard. To explain them here would not
be half as helpful
as for you to read them yourself, but in brief the
idea is just this: the
nature of your mind is clear and without substance,
like space, and all of
the experiences you have arise and subside within
that clear nature,
having no origin and leaving no trace. You
are ultimately free, and have
no need of anything. Everyone is in this same
condition.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Since
the Mahayanists burst out
of the Hinayana
coccoon, they have turned into all manner of butterflies,
from the garish
million-winged Tibetan doctrines to the simple moth-like
Zennists who haunt
Sung Dynasty ink paintings and Japanese Sumi sketches.
Mahayanists have made a practice of virtually
anything, encouraging people
to memorize 100,000 stanza poems like the Lotus
Sutra, then boiling the
whole sutra down into a single phrase, that can be
endlessly repeated as a
mantra. Tantrics from Tibet and China created
covens of sexual magic, and
were repressed, sometimes with "extreme
prejudice," to use CIA-speak, by
their fellow-Mahayanists of a more blue-nosed
orientation. Japanese Zen
teachers blended the philosphy of "sudden
enlightenment" with elements of
Shinto and the ancient code of bushido, the warrior
way, to create the
most fearsome soldiers ever known.
Remember the "Kami-kaze?" That means
"the wind of the gods," the old Shinto
gods, made more fearsome by the
serene acceptance of eventual death, made deadly by
the certainty that
only honor, now, is worthy of protection. If
you haven't run your finger
along the sharp edge of military Zen, you haven't
seen the full sweep of
Buddhism in action.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Stuck
At Step One</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">So
what did Buddha teach? What
is the true Buddhist path? It depends on who
you ask. The usual
approach at this stage in the narrative is to start
ticking off some
numerical lists -- The Four Noble Truths, The
Eightfold Path, the
Twelve-fold Wheel of Interdependent Origination,
the Five Skhandas,
etcetera. If you get involved with the
Tibetans, their lists start to
proliferate like the United States Code, with
subheadings, sub-subheadings
and footnotes. We're not taking that route
here, because we're gonna get
stuck right at the First Noble Truth.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">How
do you deal with the ten
thousand shouting
doctrinal assertions? Our crazy idea is to emulate the
Buddha -- to
reject everything that everyone is selling and try to take a
first look at the
problem with our own eyes. Is there a
problem?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha
said there was a problem,
a huge,
insurmountable problem. That is his
First Noble Truth: Life Is
Suffering. The next three Noble Truths assert
that the Cause of Suffering
is Desire, that Desire Can Be Stopped, and that The
Eightfold Path Leads
to Stopping Desire. This follows the ancient
Vedic tradition of medical
diagnosis -- "the patient has tonsilitis; the
cause of tonsilitis is
infection; the infection can be cured; and, the
cure is the administration
of streptomyicin." </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Obviously,
step one is to
diagnose the
disease correctly. So what do you
think about Buddha's
diagnosis? Before you accept his solution, I
suggest you agree on the
problem, eh? If you don't think life is
suffering, you're on the wrong
bus. Because this one's going to Nirvana, the
end of the road, the last
stop right after No Desire. Hardly anyone
goes there. Still interested,
or you wanna think it over?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Think
of how much time people
would save if they
just thought about that. "Do I
think <i>all </i>life
is suffering?" Most people, being honest
with themselves, would have to
say, "Hell no, I love drinkin' and screwin'
and eatin' good food and
reading good books and watchin' Winona Ryder on TV,
and I love Angelina
Jolie and that Andy Kaufman was so funny --
whatever happened to him?"
But once you become a Buddhist, you'll learn to lug
around this heavy ball
and chain of simulated misery with you
everywhere. When people ask how
you are, you'll smile like a weary Bodhisattva (or
Arhat), point at your
portable ball and chain, and shake your head in a
mute sharing of
knowledge. The wan smile that passes between
you and your Buddhist
brother will say it all, "Samsara," the
painful cycle of life and death.
But as soon as the other Buddhist walks away,
you'll just deflate that
ball and chain, pack it in the trunk and drive home
not thinking about it
again. You go back to being normal.
Nobody can be that good all the
time. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Until
of course something awful
actually does
happen. Then it's flop back down on
your meditation
cushion, seeking shelter from the winds of your
insane mind. You can see
her flirting with that guy, god you hate him.
Concentrate on your
breath. In - out, in - out, in - out.
Oh he is such a phony prick. Five
minutes later, concentrate on your breath
again. He has money. That's
it, he's got money, and chicks always go for
that. Being spiritual gets
you nothing. Except of course inner
peace. Concentrate on your breath.
In - out, in - out.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">And
people complain about this
all the time.
They say, "Oh, I was so much happier before I started
meditating. Now I just sit down and as soon
as I try to control my mind,
it goes crazy!" They view this as a
problem, of course. They came to
find inner peace and they got inner turmoil.
Most teachers say, "stick
with it, it will get better," and most of all
they say, "actually, you are
now simply <i>becoming aware of how turbulent your
mind always was</i>."
Frankly, I think this is bunk. Your mind will
in fact become more
turbulent when you start watching it, just like a
three year old kid. The
kid's mom will tell you, "Don't encourage him,
or he'll never quiet
down." When people meditate in the
Buddhist fashion, it disturbs their
natural way of being.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">You
know why? Because they were
getting along just fine not watching their
thoughts, or second-guessing
their motivations. Things were actually going
along okay. But they
weren't satisfied with that, noooooo. They
wanted to make their life
incrementally better -- more peace, more happiness,
less stress and fear.
They wanted to improve the situation, but they
didn't want to discover
that the situation was fundamentally screwed
up! I mean, my life has
problems, but it's not so bad that I want to get
rid of life itself. I
just want fewer bad things to happen, and more
pleasant things. A child
wants more ice cream and TV. An adult male
wants more money and sex. A
budding young woman wants romance. People in
jail want to be out -- they
think they would be happy then -- but they get out
and they're still
unhappy, and they end up back in jail.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Most
beginning Buddhists want to
improve their
view. They're a little subtler than
the average guy, and
they want to be freed from the turbulent flow of
conflicting thoughts.
They want to see their fellow beings with love and
understanding, not
poisoned by the flow of jealousy and hate.
They credit themselves with
being good people, with wanting good things, and
they want to build on
this foundation of goodness. They do not want
to find out that their
existing structure of thought is out of control,
chaotic, and
self-defeating.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Because
of this, frankly, we are
not on the same
page with the Buddha. He was burned
out on palace life,
and burned out on spiritual life, too. <i>And
he knew we wouldn't
understand his point of view.</i> Remember,
right at the beginning, after
he realized Enlightenment, he almost didn't bother
to teach. Why?
Because we can't get on the same page with
him.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Meditation
will, perhaps, if
practiced
correctly, put us on the same page with Buddha.
Because, while
we are unhappy in part, but not wanting to discard
the whole, he was fed
up altogether, and relieved himself of his
ignorance once and for all.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Buddha's
First Noble Truth is
usually translated
as "Life is Suffering." But
I really wonder. Because
if that were the case, then suicide would be the
solution, and universal
annihilation of all life would be total
success.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Let's
go back and join our horny
meditator, trying
to watch his breath while chasing girls in his mind.
What's this guy learning? He's learning that
he can't escape his mind.
This fact may make him very unhappy, but he will
refuse to blame, or
credit, Buddhism for his condition. Nope, he
will blame his "inability to
meditate." He will reject the conclusion
that the data compels -- that
his <i>mind</i> is suffering.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chogyam
Trungpa Rinpoche, a
Tibetan teacher,
explained what this poor guy is going through:</font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 60px; margin-right: 60px">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">We
expect the teachings to solve all
our problems; we
expect to be provided with magical means to deal with our
depressions, our
aggressions, our sexual hangups. But
to our surprise we
begin to realize that this is not going to happen.
It is very
disappointing to realize that we must work on
ourselves and our suffering
rather than depend upon a savior or the magical
power of yogic
techniques. It is rather disappointing to
realize that we have to give up
our expectations rather than build on the basis of
our preconceptions.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">But
this is not bad news.
Through disappointment we make progress:</font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 60px; margin-right: 60px">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Such
a series of disappointments
inspires us to
give up ambition. We fall down and
down and down, until we
touch the ground, until we relate with the basic
sanity of earth. We
become the lowest of the low, the smallest of the
small, a grain of sand,
perfectly simple, no expectations. When we
are grounded, there is no room
for dreaming or frivolous impulse, so our practice
at last becomes
workable.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">And
what is this mysterious
"practice" he refers to?
What is this grounding you get? You accept the
First Noble Truth -- which I would prefer to
express as "My Mind is
Suffering." If you speed right past this
point, and just go on trying to
implement "the magical power of yogic
techniques," you will blame "Life"
or "The World" or "Samsara" for
your suffering. You will think that
Buddhism is your ally in the war against the
ordinary existence we all
live. You will think that nature, the force
of procreation, sexual
impulse, simple hunger and intellectual curiosity,
are the problem. You
will view innocent children as the hapless
playthings of a cruel,
manipulative force called "Life."
You will try to stamp out your own
impulses, thinking that this is how you put an end
to suffering. And this
is totally wrong. It is not
Buddhism.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Getting
to Second Base</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Ignorance
-- did someone say
ignorance?
When you accept that First Noble Truth, you discover your
first level of ignorance -- you did not realize
that your mind is the
source of suffering. Initially, this is a
very painful discovery, and you
want to run away from the experience. Many
people attempt to flee
Buddhism at this point, and doctrinaire Buddhists
do little to help,
telling them that they just need to "tame
their mind" and the magic will
take over. It can be a lot like a bad
psychedelic trip, a "no exit"
situation that keeps ratcheting up to a higher
level of tension, or like
the mind state of a person who suddenly realizes
they've been locked into
their room, and keeps trying the door, becoming
more desperate every time
they find it still locked.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">You're
not going anywhere. The
door really will not open. It is not even a
door. You just painted it on
the wall so you could think you could leave.
You used to dream that you
sometimes left, and went outside. But that
was a dream. You may weep,
realizing that you were dreaming all that time.
You may miss the dreams,
the illusion. You may wish you could go back,
curse the Buddha, and take
another path. Back into town, wherever,
anywhere but here.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Depending
on luck and
disposition, you
can make things a lot worse at this point.
You may
grimly force yourself to "face reality,"
by which you mean exerting
continual effort to oppose the impulse to escape,
and taking all of the
"blame" for the unpleasantness. You
may overdo it, thinking that the
doctrinaire approach means denying that life has
any pleasure in it, or
labeling the pleasure as sinful. By doing
this, you quite miss the point
of the First Noble Truth, which merely defines the
problem. To solve it,
you must move on.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Moving
on, you start to relax.
You sit down, and use some simple techniques to
just stay there. You sort
of mature into the situation, becoming a
"lifer." This is it. You
believe it. And strangely enough, the dreams
resume. A breath of
ventilation sneaks in. The room becomes less
solid. Light shines in.
People come visit. Sounds disturb you.
Sights intrude. You laugh.
Suddenly you realize "I'm no worse off than I
was before. I'm in exactly
the same situation. I'm still having dreams,
but I'm noticing that
they're dreams." You realize, "I
was all worked up over nothing! Of
course it's all my mind. Of course I suffer
because of my mind. Of
course I enjoy because of my mind. And also,
I am here." You laugh. "I
am here."</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">And
you will start to realize the
meaning of the
Second Noble Truth: "The Cause
of Suffering is Desire."
Because you will notice that whims, inclinations,
notions, little wisps of
desire, get you going. You're just sitting
there in your cell, looking
through the transparent walls, watching the ghosts
come and go, and then
you'll think, "I should go and do this or
that." And you'll run down that
mental path, and then you'll notice that
everything's become quite solid
again. Your dreams are so solid when you
believe in them. Then you'll
wake up in your cell, suffering. You cannot
fail to observe the
connection.</font></p>
<p><u><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
Wheel Stops</font></u></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">So
now we've found the culprit --
desire.
So we pull out our telescopic rifle and sight in on the little
devil. Pow! One more gone. That
much closer to Nirvana, right? You can
try it, and these varmint-hunter Buddhists can be
found everywhere.
They're about as good humored as ranchers who want
to kill off all the
coyotes and mountain lions. They figure their
virtues are like tender
calves that need to be protected from predatory
emotions. So they put out
poisoned meat, leg traps, whatever it takes.
Their minds become
mine-fields, and their meditation is like a
fortified location. Inside,
they're safe from desire, but it lurks everywhere
around them, an enemy
that will never be subdued.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Do
not take this approach to The
Third and Fourth
Noble Truths, which taken together say that "Desire Can
Be Stopped By
Applying the Noble Eightfold Path."
Because the force of
desire is so vast and powerful that the ocean waves
and the winds that
howl through the mountains are weak by comparison.
The force of desire,
you will observe as you sit in your cell, is
coextensive with your breath
and your mind. Some traditions of Hindu
mysticism say you need to
actually stop breathing to stop thinking.
It's probably true, but the
Buddha tried that, and he always found he had to
start breathing again.
We do not stop desire by jamming a stick in Mother
Nature's spokes, for
she will blithely break all sticks.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">At
this point, more subtlety is
needed.
Just as we penetrated the notion of "life is suffering" to
unearth "my mind is suffering," we need
to take a look at the meaning of
"stopping desire." Let's
look. If we try to stop desire, first there is
the concept of desire as separate from ourselves,
then there is the notion
of needing to end it, then there is the effort to
end it. Hence the
analogy of the varmint hunter, who sights, aims and
shoots. If we turn
from this outward-oriented analysis, and look at
where desire truly
resides -- inside ourselves -- we realize that
stopping desire is going to
be the biggest journey of self-understanding that
can be made. For to
find the foundation of desire within ourselves is
to journey inward,
seeking to understand what has animated our first
movements, from when a
baby first reaches for a mother's breast, or young
people seek out their
first sexual encounter.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">We
then regard desire far more
tenderly.
No metaphor of surgery or war is suitable here. Analogies to
removing tumors and overcoming enemies abound in
Buddhism. I reject them
as misleading and violent. To stop desire is
so much more subtle than
that. For that part of us that
"desires" is no small part, not even an
expendable Siamese twin that we could kill and yet
keep our own heart
beating. Desire is inseparable from us like
salt is inseparable from
blood.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">So
what is this Eightfold Path
that will end
desire? Literally, it is a list of
eight things that
everyone does. We all have views, but if you
have Right View, you will
see your way to the end of desire. We all
have intentions, but if you
adopt Right Intention, it leads to the end of
desire. Similarly, we can
have Right Speech, Right Discipline, Right Work,
Right Effort, Right
Mindfulness, and Right Meditation. Obviously,
the important term here is
"Right," and that is subject to
interpretation, so let's get the best one
we can, from Trungpa Rinpoche:</font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 60px; margin-right: 60px">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">In
order to see what this is, we
first must
understand what Buddha meant by "right."
He did not mean to
say right as opposed to wrong at all. He said
"right" meaning "what is,"
being right without a concept of what is right.
"Right" translates the
Sanskrit <i>samyak</i>, which means "complete."
Completeness needs no
relative help, no support through comparison; it is
self-sufficient. In a
bar one says, "I would like a straight drink."
Not diluted with club soda
or water; you just have it straight. That is
samyak. No dilutions, no
concoctions -- just a straight drink. Buddha
realized that life could be
potent and delicious, positive and creative, and he
realized that you do
not need any concoctions with which to mix it.
Life is a straight drink
-- hot pleasure, hot pain, straightforward, one
hundred percent.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Does
this seem like no help at
all?
Like you should just go have a drink? It doesn't sound like this
Buddhist would mind if you did, so by all means,
don't let me stop you.
Just come back and sip it while you read the rest
of this, because it's
actually going to tie up very
conveniently.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Okay,
got your drink? Let's just
go back to our cell and see how this works.
You stop seeing "out there,"
and start seeing the whole experience as "my
world - my mind." That's
part one. You start to get some ventilation,
because you perforate the
claustrophobia of being stuck "in here"
and trying to get "out there."
It's all in here. Then you find you have a
modicum of control over what's
in here. You can't stop desire, but you see
it come and go. Sometimes
you manage to sidestep an incoming impulse, and you
laugh as it goes
blindly by. Sometimes you see a huge roller
of desire coming in, and you
paddle out to meet it, and surf it all the way in,
arriving wet and
exhilirated. Your relationship with desire
develops through acceptance,
and surprisingly, you find yourself observing
impulses with an unforced
detachment that becomes more natural the more it
develops. As you become
accustomed to watching and experiencing your
impulses, you will realize
their wholesome, developmental aspect, because they
no longer dictate your
reality. Your cell, far from claustrophobic,
will become interesting,
intricate, fascinating, a laboratory for study,
experiment, and discovery.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">You
don't have to do anything
else except
develop this comfort level with your reality.
Right View?
Just see it straight, and drop the preconceptions
as you note them
arising. Right Work? Just get out of
bed and go do it. Right
Meditation? Your cell is waiting. Right
Effort? Just keep it up,
without any frills or expectations. It's like
sawing a piece of wood --
you don't have to visualize it cut in half -- just
stroke it with the saw
until it falls off.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">The
experience of living can
begin again.
Most of us in adulthood feel as if our learning and
development ended about the time we left high
school or college. Since
then, it's been one disillusioning discovery after
another. Travelling
the Noble Eightfold Path is something like becoming
a child again, because
once we learn that our style of perceiving the
world determines our
experience, we realize we are best off using our
mind in its fresh,
unobstructed condition, allowing knowledge to
stream in through our
senses, and trusting the way in which the world
takes shape in our mind.
We see the painful sense of restraint felt by the
mind trying to escape
itself gradually diminishing. The Buddha says
that by following the Right
Path, our pain ultimately comes to an end -- for
most of us it will be
enough just to get pointed in the right direction.
</font></p>
<p align="right"><font face="Times New Roman"
size="4"><a href="what.bud.toc.htm">
Return to Table of Contents</a></font></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</div>
</body>
</html> |