[Home] [Home B] [Evolve] [Viva!] [Site Map] [Site Map A] [Site Map B] [Bulletin Board] [SPA] [Child of Fortune] [Search] [ABOL]

ADDICTED TO WAR -- WHY THE U.S. CAN'T KICK MILITARISM

Few people anywhere in the world, including the Middle East, support bin Laden's terrorist methods. But most people in the Middle East share his anger at the United States. They are angry at the U.S. for supporting corrupt and dictatorial regimes in the region, for supporting Israel at the expense of the Palestinians and for imposing U.S. dictates on the Middle East through military might and brutal economic sanctions.

The Bush Administration immediately instructed U.S. television networks to "exercise caution" in airing bin Laden's tape messages. The official reason?

The tapes may contain secret coded messages for terrorist operatives.

But were covert messages the Administration's main concern? Perhaps it was more worried about the impact of bin Laden's overt message -- that the September 11 attacks were carried out in retaliation for U.S. foreign policy and particularly U.S. military intervention in the Middle East.

If Americans realized that U.S. military intervention abroad brought retaliation --causing death and destruction at home -- we might think twice about whether the U.S. should be so eager to go to war overseas.

The Pentagon has demonstrated time and again that its advanced weaponry can devastate countries targeted for attack, leveling basic infrastructure and killing thousands, even hundreds of thousands of people.

It would be naive to think there would be no retaliation.

Go to Next Page