[Home] [Home B] [Evolve] [Viva!] [Site Map] [Site Map A] [Site Map B] [Bulletin Board] [SPA] [Child of Fortune] [Search] [ABOL]

CONFRONTING THE EVIDENCE -- A CALL TO REOPEN THE 9-11 INVESTIGATION -- TRANSCRIPT AND SCREENCAP GALLERY

Furthermore, when you look at the size of the hole at the Pentagon, it was approximately 65 feet across and the height of the Pentagon is approximately 73 feet. From wingtip to wingtip a 757 is 124 feet, 10 inches. From nose to tail a 757 is 155 ft. and 3 inches in length. And the height is 44 feet and 6 inches. However, when you look at the hole in the Pentagon, you'll find that it's only approximately 65 feet across. How does a plane of those dimensions fit into a hole of only 65 feet across?

Upon further inspection, we found that the damage at the Pentagon was completely and totally inconsistent with the damage of the planes that had hit the World Trade Center. I mean, after all, the planes that hit the Trade Center created a fire so intense that it fatigued the steel and collapsed the buildings, or so that's what we were told. And yet, when you look at the left side of the Pentagon you'll note that there is very little, if any, smoke damage or heat damage at all. On the third floor it's very plain to see a file cabinet with a computer monitor. Neither of them are damaged. On the second floor, you can see a wooden desk that hasn't burned. And on the first floor, a very curious sight indeed, a wooden stool with a book that is laying and open. The pages aren't even singed.

Now which of the planes involved in the September 11th attacks had embarked upon transcontinental flights? Which means that they had a majority of their fuel left over when they hit their respective targets. That means that approximately 8,600 remaining gallons of fuel would have been ignited on the 757 that had hit the Pentagon. Again, we look at the photograph and ask ourselves, "Is the smoke and heat damage consistent with that amount of fuel being ignited?

Another interesting question that is raised is in the photographs of the collapsed area of the Pentagon, if you'll note in the upper floor and roof area, it appears that that area simply collapsed and does not show any impact damage from a tail section that was over 43 feet in height. How could a 757 slam into the Pentagon and not have an impact area where the tail section would have hit the upper floors?

Shortly after these questions were raised, and the topic was open for discussion on our radio show, ThePowerHour,com, these five frames were released from a security camera at the Pentagon. The only problem is that the release of these five photographs seem to raise more questions than they answer.

Go to Next Page