|
by Dave vonKleist
Introduction
The events of September 11, 2001 are undeniably and
inarguably the most significant acts of terrorism and aggression ever
perpetrated against this country. It is indisputable that the three
destructive occurrences at the World Trade Center's north tower, south
tower and the Pentagon, were well-planned, orchestrated and coordinated
events and are inescapably tied to one another. It is safe to say that the
guilty parties would do anything to remain cloaked in secrecy and will
create "rabbit trails" to divert attention away from significant
information as they attempt to cover-up and obfuscate any data that would
lead to their discovery. Additionally, those guilty would of course make
every attempt to discredit or otherwise destroy the credibility of anyone
who might raise revealing questions. To expose one of these entities
involved in this deception would be a most significant and vital clue that
could reveal the perpetrators of these events.
At the outset, it is safe to assume that this paper and
analysis will most likely be looked upon as the most outrageous and
delusional proposal ever conceived, the product of the most extreme of
conspiracy theorists, or it may provoke the reader to think beyond the
intellectual boundaries which have been imposed by the daily repetitions
of the "conventional wisdom" of governmental agencies and the mainstream
media. The approach of this investigation is simply to ask questions and
utilize common sense as the facts and evidence are compared to what has
been purported by "official" sources.
Many readers are naturally inclined to gravitate toward
the former when confronted with ideas considered "outside the box";
therefore, it is necessary to define the phrase "conspiracy theory".
The term "conspiracy theory" consists of two words, the
active word being "theory". By definition, a theory is a concept, an idea,
a proposal, a supposition. Example: "In theory, if I purchase a raffle
ticket, I could win the prize." However, once the first ticket is
purchased, winning is no longer a theory, but rather a possibility. The
more tickets that are purchased, the more possible and eventually probable
the win becomes. The same can be said about a conspiracy theory. As long
as there is no evidence to support the conspiracy theory, it remains a
theory. Once however there is one piece of evidence to support the theory,
no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, the conspiracy is no
longer a theory, but a possibility! And the more evidence there is that is
gathered, the more possible and eventually probable the conspiracy
becomes.
There is no disputing that an explosive event large
enough to demolish a portion of the Pentagon occurred on the morning of
Sept. 11, 2001. For argument sake, let's take the approach of a police
investigator or a detective as we begin to attempt to solve this crime.
Using this perspective, we will only deal with known facts and the
available photographic evidence to determine the validity of the reports
and explanations of media and government officials.
Media News Reports
With this in mind let us now look at the report of a
plane hitting the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001. As
reported, at 8:10 AM EST, Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport
bound for Los Angeles, California, a distance of almost 2700 miles. It was
also reported that the Boeing 757 slammed into the northwest face of the
Pentagon at 9:40 AM, destroying three of its five rings. If, as
investigators, we had come upon a crime scene such as the Pentagon, the
first task would be to examine the building and surrounding area, and
employ common sense and the available evidence to support the "theory" of
a Boeing 757 hitting the building.
The first and most important task after arriving at the
scene of a crime would be to examine the plane wreckage and determine the
point of impact, the trajectory, angle and speed of the aircraft at the
point of impact. There is only one problem. There is no trace of
recognizable wreckage from a Boeing 757! There is no fuselage, no tail
section, there are no wheels, engines, wings, luggage or passenger seats,
nor are there any bodies to be found. This leads us to our first and
foremost question, "If a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon as was
reported by the media and government officials, where did it go? What
evidence is there to support the theory of an airliner careening into the
building?"
According to Boeing, the 757 has a wingspan of 124 ft.,
10 in., an overall length of 155 ft., 3 in., a tail height of 44 ft., 6
in., and the maximum fuel capacity is 11,489 gallons. With these
statistics in mind let's begin our examination of the photographic
evidence.
Critical Analysis of Photographic Evidence
This first photo shows an
overhead view of the Pentagon with an outline of a Boeing 757 overlay to
show the proposed point of impact and relative size. Note the charred
"horseshoe" that extends from the inner portion of the building to the
area of the supposed crash site, along the outer ring to the east, and
then back to the inner ring. More on this later.
Photo #2 shows an aerial view
looking down to the northwest face of the Pentagon. One can plainly see
that there are no apparent skid marks where a 757 might have hit the
ground and slammed into the building. That would indicate that the plane
was indeed still airborne when making contact. Also note once again the
charred roof damage as in the previous picture.
In photo # 3, we begin to get a
closer look at the proposed point of impact. There are several important
issues that are raised by this photograph. First, the most obvious
question to ask is: "Where is the wreckage of a 757?" There are no signs
of wreckage whatsoever! As stated earlier, there is nothing in this or any
other photograph available at this time that indicates that an aircraft
the size of a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Notice the size of the
demolished area. The Pentagon is four stories high, and if each story is
10-12ft in height, and the added height for the roof area is another
10ft., the total height of the building would be approximately 58ft. The
width of the hole according to this and other photos would be about
60-65ft. The wingspan of a 757 as stated earlier is almost 125ft. Why is
there no visible damage on either side of the hole where the wings would
have struck? Keep in mind that the fuel is carried in both the fuselage
and the wing tanks. Notice also the lack of roof damage to the immediate
right of the hole and the area just beyond it heading into the center of
the Pentagon where it appears the charred roof continues. Finally, once
again, there is no indication that a plane hit the ground at any time
before making contact.
Photo #4 illustrates the
approximate size of a 757 in relation to the hole that is claimed to be
the result of such a plane slamming into the building. It is
self-explanatory.
Photo #5 shows the roof area that
collapsed into the demolished area. Notice that the roof for the most part
is still intact and came down in mostly one piece. It is also important to
note that the area just below the roof also remained relatively intact.
Given the tail height of almost 45 ft., and the fact that there is no
evidence that an aircraft hit the ground and slid into the Pentagon, how
is it possible that the roof and area immediately below remained virtually
undamaged save for the collapse?
Photo #6 is a vital piece of this puzzle. There have
been hundreds of photos from this angle of the gaping hole in the
Pentagon, but this one was chosen for two reasons. First, it was scanned
from one of the countless publications by Time, Newsweek, People, and
others, to commemorate the event because of the caption. The final
sentence reads: "The jagged wound cut through three of the buildings five
rings, trapping hundreds of people." On reviewing the first three
pictures, one can easily see that only one of the buildings rings was
penetrated.
To make the next and possibly the most important point
of this report, let us recall the other events that happened earlier that
day. At 8:45 AM EST, American flight #11 slammed into the North Tower at
the World Trade Center. The resulting fireball was so huge and so hot,
that as reported, it melted and fatigued the supporting steel girders to
the point that the building collapsed. At 9:03 AM EST, United flight #175
slammed into the South Tower at the World Trade Center. The resulting
fireball was so huge and so hot, that as reported, it melted and fatigued
the supporting steel girders to the point that the building collapsed. At
9:40 AM, EST, American flight #77 reportedly slammed into the Pentagon.
All three of these planes had embarked on a trans-continental flight and
carried approximately 8,600 remaining gallons of fuel at the time of their
respective impacts. The first two crashes caused intense fires hot enough
to melt steel. Now look very closely at photo #6. Notice the left side of
the hole and note that the walls of the interior are not only unblemished,
but show no signs of soot, smoke or heat damage. On the upper floor, to
the left of one of the support columns, one can plainly see a green file
cabinet with a computer monitor or TV on top of it. Two floors below one
can plainly see a wooden stool with an open book on top of it. Are we to
believe that a plane with 8,600 gallons of fuel would not generate a
fireball and enough heat to singe the pages of an open book only feet
away? or to melt the plastic case of a monitor?
If the fire was so localized, how is it when we look at
photo #7, we can see farther down on the left side of the building, flame
shooting out of the window? If there was a fireball as reported, and as is
illustrated in the recently released surveillance film from the Pentagon,
how could the fire have directed itself in such a way as to create a
"horseshoe" of roof damage, damaging a major part of the north rings.
Was the damage of the Pentagon caused by a Boeing 757 as
reported by government officials, or was it the result of some other event
which is being covered up in an attempt to mislead and manipulate the
American people into a war and into the willing relinquishment of their
rights?
Conclusion
Please note that there are no accusations being made
and there are no "theories" being proposed in this report. Questions
however have been raised that demand answers. The implications are far too
important to be ignored. If the government agencies and mainstream media
choose to ignore the facts and evidence presented by this and many other
articles addressing these issues, than their silence can only be
interpreted as consent to the vilest of deceptions the world has ever
known.
From Deception to Revelation Part II
Newly revealed photos are irrefutable proof that
a Boeing 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon!
By Dave vonKleist
Within 12 hours of posting the first part of this
analysis, photos were discovered that show that a fire truck had responded
to a fire that had been possibly caused by a small aircraft hitting the
lower portion of the Pentagon. The area had not yet collapsed and
firefighters were working to contain the flames. The collapse occurred
after fire retardant foam had extinguished a portion of the fire. These
photos are self-explanatory and are irrefutable evidence that the damage
to the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, was not caused by a Boeing 757, and
in fact the story about the airliner is a complete fabrication.
The implications are of indescribable significance and
it must be assumed the Pentagon, the U.S. military, the government and the
media are engaged in the biggest cover-up in the history of this country,
if not the world. As stated in the first part of this analysis, the events
of September 11, 2001 are inescapably tied to one another, and if one
group can be tied to one of these events, it would be safe to assume that
they would be tied to all of them. No one wants to even entertain the idea
of our own government being responsible for the horrific slaughter on
innocent lives, police officers and firefighters, but the evidence is now
before us that this might very well be the case.
Note that the area in question had not yet collapsed.
The area being sprayed in the above picture is the apparent point of
impact of a small aircraft, possibly a Piper Cub or as some may have
postulated, an F-16 fighter.
Note the large wire spools in the center of this
picture. It had been reported that the Pentagon had been in the process of
being renovated in this area and had just been re-wired. The roof-line and
face of the building is still visible and had not yet collapsed.
We now see the damage that we have all seen in prior
photos. The official story was released by the Pentagon and the mainstream
media that a Boeing 757 had slammed into the Pentagon. Note also the wire
spools still in place.
These photos are just a few of hundreds that have been
available but show clearly and undeniably that America and the world have
been manipulated and lied to. We owe it to the victims, their families,
the firefighters, the police officers, America and the world, to demand
that the real guilty parties, THE REAL TERRORISTS, be brought to
justice. The madness must be stopped before we are led into a third world
war because of a lie. Is there no one willing to stand up against this
horrendous injustice? In America, are we truly the land of the free?.. or
the home of the brave? Let’s prove it.
_______________
American Buddha Librarian's Comment:
This attack on the Pentagon proves that
America's enemies are in control of the White House. If we had
friends in the White House, they would NEVER have allowed an attack on the
premier symbol of American strength and male military pride. This
attack shows that America has no strength to fight the enemies who did
this. It is the ultimate symbol of defeat, and was meant to
communicate exactly this message. For all intents and purposes, we
have no military in the United States of America. Our military is
obviously all working for somebody else. But who?, they should ask.
Return to Table of Contents |
